Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vedaprodarte's comments login

This problem appears again and again...


Hi, may I know more about the compensation, accommodation and the VISA arrangement?


Thanks! I am planning to write more about Google Adwords. Stay tuned.


A question: Should we take it as "a computer beating a human" or "developers beating a Go player"? I had this discussion with my friends and we have opposite opinions.


Developers beat a Go player in the same way civil engineers carry cars across the San Francisco bay.


It should be "a computer beating the human" in my opinion. It's just like parents bathing in the success of their offspring. Yes, they can be proud, but no, they didn't achieve the "win" themselves.


If the developers behind AlphaGo did the same calculations with pen and paper as they sat across from the human player, would that be them achieving the win themselves? If so, why does having an automated piece of paper change that?

"It's just like parents bathing in the success of their offspring."

There is no offspring here. There is a set of calculations, written by some people.


If a parent watches their child win a game, would that be them achieving the win themselves? If so, why does having nine months of creation time and ten years of training time change that?


There is no child here. There is a deterministic set of calculations. The developers created a deterministic set of calculations, and then executed those calculations.

AlphaGo is not a child. AlphaGo is a set of deterministic calculations, defined and created by some people. Your question about humans and their children is irrelevant. There is no child here.

In this flawed analogy, the "parents" are the developers, and the "child" is a set of calculations. If someone wrote down a set of calculations, and then executed those calculations and won, is it right to say that the person who wrote down those calculations won? I suggest that it is.


And yet the operative fact is that a human could not execute those calculations in a lifetime.


So what? Doesn't change the facts. There is no child here. There is a set of deterministic calculations written by some people, and executed.


I agree with EliRivers.

I'm pretty sure that if I wrote a child from scratch (AGCTTAACGGUAA ... etc), understood the underlying mechanisms connecting proteins to wining a baseball tournament ... I should get some credit for the win :)

There is no insight in making a child (can be done totally drunk and half passed out), although there is some in education.


please give the definition for a set of deterministic calculations.


Are you serious? You want me to tell you what calculations are? Having trouble using google with those flippers, I expect.


This news has been posted by kazehana03 an hour ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11222107


The back-door owner owns different IP addresses and the data are randomly sent to his addresses. This can also explain "random"~~


Random? I think it means the back-door owner owns several IP addresses and the data are just "randomly" sent to those IP.


I think the price is acceptable for a developing product. There is a high cost in R&D.


In 2008, when not all of us are using smartphones, we always remind the smartphone users to protect their privacy. We told them not to upload their photos. But now, who cares? Everyone should know where I am!


Thanks, you have reminded me some huge IT companies that can also be related with this case! Amazon and the other IT infrastructure companies. Why are they missing or remain silent? Does it implies anything?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: