yes, it does and its realtime.
personally, I use typst locally, but
the online editor utilises WASM, so if I'm not mistaken, the rendering is real-time and handled by the front-end.
no, I pointed towards the joy of writing in a proper IDE.
but to your point: overleaf is a key enabler of latex and its cool to see typst offers a similar route
If you know the font in advance (which you often do in these cases) you can do insane reconstructions. Also keep in mind that it doesn't have to be a perfect match, with the help of the color and other facts (such as likely location) about the car you can narrow it down significantly.
I feel like a lot of hype around Tailscale is because it vastly simplifies VPNs and their associated networking, especially for businesses, startups, or homelabs where the focus might be elsewhere or specific talent is unavailable. The problem arises when folks don't quite understand why specific decisions are being made, or use the product in nonstandard (or even negative) ways. I've seen stories of folks deploying Tailscale on every machine in their LAN, thinking that secures their traffic; using it to cross boundaries in the firewall or router between secure and insecure VLANs; and using it to connect to servers in lieu of a proper router or firewall with appropriate ACLs.
Tailscale is an excellent piece of software, provided it's implemented in a way to emphasize security, and not weaken it. In OPs case, being used as an accessibility aide to a system that couldn't be secured any other way while preserving external access (in their case due to CGNAT) was an excellent use of Tailscale.
> I do think this simplicity is exactly what contributes to those weird and non-standard configurations.
This is why I am confident I will always have employment in IT. As I make things simpler for others to use, they in turn will find new and innovative ways of making my eyes bleed from cursed workflows that once again require professional intervention for simplicity, efficiency, and security.
> I feel like a lot of hype around Tailscale is because it vastly simplifies VPNs and their associated networking
Tailscale is based on Wire Guard, isn’t it? Now there’s a piece of software that truly made VPNs simple. I have a tunnel back into my LAN by way of an EC2 instance and all it took was two super simple config files on each machine.
Wireguard vastly simplifies the transport level, and attains high performance because it runs in the kernel.
Tailscale simplifies: authentication (including OIDC), authorization (via ACLs), DNS, NAT piercing. All of that is not obvious or easy for someone without deeper expertise.
They have nice clients (e.g. for MacOS, Tizen). Ofc headscale is a thing, but if you have a company, it's also nice to have someone to yell at if your mission-critical tailnet suddenly b0rks.
Imo they don't charge all that much relative to their value, depending on who you're asking.
Wrong, what it's missing from passkey is phishing resistance. And you can use passkeys with at least a few independent commercial password managers if you are not happy giving your passkeys to Google & Apple (I work for one such password manager)
Psst: your employer is a vendor benefiting from said lock-in.
Without a means for transfering from one password management resource to another, passkeys create an increasingly significant friction against migrating one's account and artifically reduces competitive pressure on the vendor.
The phrase we use for that anti-consumer phenomenom is "vendor lock-in"
(If your employer has an effective and practical import and export technique for passkeys, I would be delighted to hear so and apologize for the suggestion otherwise. But as far as I've seen, that's not a thing.)
That is table stakes. So, rewind 5 years. Introduce that, remove attestation while you are at it. And make sure we have multiple compatible implementations.
Without it passkeys are a sham. And since that was and is the case I don't see any conceivable future where passkeys benefit anyone but google/apple/ms. For the sake of the web it needs to die.
Being able to export a passkey sounds like a bug, not a feature. I was surprised that the spec was altered to allow hosting in the cloud at all, I thought it was more interesting as a means of keeping secrets in secure enclaves.
The expectation is that for any service you should be able to have multiple passkeys -- including multiple passkeys from different vendors. I'm not sure how that exactly causes lock in?
Exactly, you can just register passkeys from multiple providers if that's a fear. Worst case (i.e. Google nukes your account and you've only set one passkey), you go through the usual email recovery or backup codes process and set a new one.
It would be good to have a FOSS-implementation with TPM as the storage backend for computers and phones. Then people wouldn't need to use keys stored in the cloud.
Assuming you've only set one passkey (you can add multiple passkeys from different passkey managers) it's no more of an inconvenience than if you lost your password. Normal recovery/backup code processes still work.
Yes, Your phone or laptop though... that we dont have regulations that at least require manufacturers to give users the option to not charge to 100% is beyond me.
Many billions of batteries and thus billions of devices needlessly scrapped.
I only skimmed for now and will keep a lookout for the mentioned post about the Creality.
But all filament dryers I've seen so far seems to be pure garbage I'd never trust in my home. Which kind of makes sense, they are easy and cheap to make so only bottom of the barrel crap can compete.
But if anyone knows better or have recommendations about proper units / brands please let me know.
Hey, I'm the author of the blog article. I saw your comment and decided to write a detailed critical review of the dryer and write about the specifications. you can find it here: https://syntaxglow.com/2025/02/08/creality-space-pi-filament... or just look at my blog for the latest article :) I'm curious of what you think.
Thanks! And good job, it is quite thorough. I have not done my research and I feel that I completely lack intuition for this. (How much ventilation is needed and how come many of these dryers don't / barely let the humid air out? And inversely how good/bad is for storage considering the ventilation. How good are desiccant bags anyway etc.)
But it looks good, best I've seen.
Would be nice with an electrical teardown just get a feel for the safety (I have no clue about the creality brand).
I like the one from Polymaker, though that is mostly because it's modular which I needed for a hard to reach space. It claims to have a thermal fuse. https://polymaker.com/introducing-polydryer
The plastic feels solid, but I did not take it apart to check if it has decent crimping or electronics.
If you trust your 3d printer, you could do what the article suggested and use your heatbed.
Thanks, the S4 looks really nice. But it seems like they shafted their kickstarter supporters. Risk is of course part of the deal but Sunlu is an established brand and is actively selling the same device they don't deliver to the people that helped to fund it...
