I’d say it’s easier to tell in the US as cities and towns tend to be heavily divided into class-based areas. Not to mention people in general are far more comfortable “showing off” their financial status.
Finland is a lot more homogenous in that sense and people certainly don’t flaunt their wealth.
I'd say this is mostly due to the fact that building software in many companies is largely a social activity, and there's an interesting intersection of personalities and motivation that ultimately disincentivizes building good quality software
I love that first point and I wish it was something that was applied even further to other pieces of data - integers and floats are intended for mathematical operations and so to make database row identifiers integers always seemed strange to me.
That's a symptom of what's known as Primitive Obsession. Back in the days of programming languages before declaring new abstract data types with either prohibitively expensive (in time and/or memory) it was valid limitation. Today, there's rarely an excuse.
When a test fails it can be difficult to pinpoint where in the pipeline it's failing. Using a debugger and setting break points is really helpful to help find the location where things are going wrong.
I think most senior or experienced Python developers tend to steer clear of Django.
It's just that you don't hear about it because it's mostly junior / less experienced developers writing about Django online.
edit: having said that, I wish we would be more skeptical of magic frameworks like Django in the Python community at least. Things like 'get_object_or_404'[1] should be burned to the ground.
I worked alongside many consultants in Canberra in mostly government agencies and there were a lot of solutions architects and project managers earning roughly $120 an hour pre-tax.
The catch was you need to be a citizen obviously to get even a low security clearance, but from memory some agencies were quite lax and didn't bother for baseline clearance.
