Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more sonnekki's commentslogin

This is a very interesting interpretation of that video. It has such a dystopian flavor. Yes, it solves problems for you, but at the expense of a full thought process.


You already live that life on the Internet. Why is it so hard to imagine it following you into the real world?


What about changes that are required during off-hours when there there is a problem: Wait until works hours to implement in production? Is this not a consideration given the context?


TFA says, "If you have a legitimate emergency, push it and get it reviewed later, ain’t no thang"

But, also, strive for a level of code quality that doesn't require that sort of thing.


We do code reviews for all committed code, but if there is an emergency in production, we deal with it the best way we can. If that means a quick fix put directly in production, we do it, but there is always a review the following day. Process is great until it isn't working - sometimes you have to side step it or even change it.


"The goal of X is to teach us about the world, not stroke Ys' egos and tell us how clever our existing theories are."

This a million times. I want this on a shirt, with the millions of X's and Y's it satisfies. Thank you for posting.


That link is really cool! Thanks for posting, it will be going on my cube wall at work.


Thanks! Used cVSY9gFdxWhdEz7Z .


I'm not so sure that it's fast, just well organized. The extreme would be to release the product and restructure the entire system "overnight": the implementation took X years but the changes were made available quickly.

This looks more like the pieces just falling into place, though I agree, the scale is a bit staggaring.


I must be missing something. When I select the 'view post' on the invite email, the interface tells me that I need an invite. Quite a conundrum!


Keep trying. Didn't work for me 2 days ago. Worked today.


My non-techie friends are interested in it too, but they heard about it through xkcd. It's quite the positive review as I interpret it.

http://xkcd.com/918/


If your non-techie friends read xkcd, they aren't terribly representative of non-techies


I know a bunch of non-techie xkcd fans that don't fit the tech geek stereotype. They tend to be nerds (ie, lawyers, biotech researchers,, etc). They also tend to be young.

xkcd is surprisingly accessible to folks who are brainy (more folks than you realize).


I don't believe XKCD is actually targeted at tech geeks. It describes itself as "A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language."

I am entirely unsurprised non-geeky brainy folks might enjoy it.


There's a reason for the website Explain XKCD.


i knew i should have googled for this...

thanks, time to lose another 10 hours of my life to xkcd (hooray for 3 day weekend)


I don't think it's silly, but I do think that it will be extremely difficult to test. People that have damaged nerve endings of the fingers probably are not good grippers, even if their fingers are wet. The control and the feedback is simply not there.


People that have damaged nerve endings of the fingers probably are not good grippers, even if their fingers are wet

I guess you actually meant "even if their fingers aren't wet"? But why do you think it would be extremely difficult to test this hypothesis? All that would be needed is to get a large enough group of people and test their gripping ability on the same surface when their fingers are wet and when they aren't.


Well not exactly. I'd imagine that the wet surface will always have lower gripping ability. You want to know if the wrinkled fingers have better grip on a wet surface than unwrinkled fingers. You could wet the fingers and immediately test the grip (before wrinkles form), and then soak them in water until they wrinkle and do it again.


Sorry about the word weirdness, waking up.

The article states: Scientists have known since the mid-1930s that water wrinkles do not form if the nerves in a finger are severed

Would such a person not have good wet-grip because:

A) They don't have the ability to form wrinkles

B) They can't grip well because they can't feel their fingers

That's the point I was getting at.


What makes you think we're not experiencing "decadence and the denial of life" now?

Suggested reading: Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: