ycombinator.com is a site that you willingly send data to, it is not an application that you use locally.
I do agree however, we do not need more laws about that, we just need the people to start using software that respects its users and can be audited by anyone - free software.
if I link to an image, javascript file, or even an iframe to ycombinator.com, your browser will make a request to ycombinator.com most likely without you knowing.
if ycombinator.com logs information on that request, is that okay? if not where does the "fault" lie? With the site that linked to a 3rd party (my website in this example)? With the site that is gathering telemetry without opt-in consent (ycombinator.com in this example)?
If it's the former (my fault for including a 3rd party request), what happens when user-submitted content includes a link to a 3rd party? What about if a user-submitted content includes a link but doesn't make a request and your browser decides to prefetch the contents of that link?
> if I link to an image, javascript file, or even an iframe to ycombinator.com, your browser will make a request to ycombinator.com most likely without you knowing.
True, which is why many people (including me) use something like umatrix with every 3rd party request disabled unless whitelisted. This should be the default to be honest.
> if ycombinator.com logs information on that request, is that okay?
You are willingly letting your traffic be logged by the original site that you connected to. Does it matter if another party (usually trusted by the first party) gets the logs as well?
> and your browser decides to prefetch the contents of that link?
Change browser or configure it properly. Who even thought that prefetching is a good idea?
Anyway, the one at fault at this specific case is your browser (and maybe you, considering how you selected to use that browser or didn't bother configuring it).
Not exactly. In the link case the application is the browser instead of the site and there are many browsers that you can select from, in the .net case however the .net itself is the application.
Didn't he establish Wikia after he donated Wikipedia to non-profit? I see nothing bad in Wales making few bucks form Wikia after what he helped to create. The Wikipedia spending problem is a different story.
In itself, no. But there was a lot of issues and conflict in relation to how the creation of Wikia affected policy, and suddenly a lot of things that had a "home" on Wikipedia were now being pushed to Wikia for a variety of reasons, some valid, and some a lot less so.
I do agree however, we do not need more laws about that, we just need the people to start using software that respects its users and can be audited by anyone - free software.