Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more snadal's comments login

I'd bet that the current price of $0/month would be valid in court.

However they did not state for how long is offer valid, so they will be able to change pricing tiers later.


Just for the records

https://ibb.co/bvSFTgL


Yeah. This price change also is applied to Confluence :D

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33245254


LOL. I guess someone is having a really bad day at JIRA.

Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33244978


Me too

https://ibb.co/t8t43fT

I guess someone at Jira is having a bad day.


It looks like Jira is testing paying user acquisition. They currently pay $765 million for each new Standard user and $1,506M in the Premium Plan :-D

https://ibb.co/BP04ZNg

Really, I wonder where these numbers come from...


It's a 10x discounted option by the looks of it.

They must be A/B testing.

https://imgur.com/xGaepnA


they didn't exclude 0-10 users (which is free) from their linear volume discount, so the discount went into the negative a bit


Maybe has something to do with Monthly/Annual conversion? Because switching to Annual shows correct values.


I'm going to hold out for more


So if your device is compromised, the attacker could trick you into entering 2FA for some minor action while it actually is transferring all your funds.

If your PC or smartphone is compromised nothing will prevent you from losing control of your accounts.


Which gives you more chance at detecting such an attack. Without 2fa, the funds are already gone.


That's kinda problem of many 2FA systems, my bank's send me the reason for 2FA and amount + last few digits of account if it is money transactions.


Yes, that is what I was trying to point out. With Yubikey or other 2FA devices you can not see the transaction details of what are you signing unless the device has a screen so a screenless device does not protect much more than this virtual yubikey.


Slightly off-topic: according to what I read, it is a lightweight proxy written in golang that is capable of starting a vm when receiving network traffic and 10 seconds after the last request it turns off the fly machine.

I've been looking for something similar for some time to use in my development docker instances (specifically with dokku). I have many services that, although they consume little CPU time, they do have a high overall consumption of RAM, but they are actually used for a few minutes each day.

I don't want to use kubernetes for this as it adds too much complexity for the benefit I would get.

Do you know any solution similar to this, to turn on / off docker containers when network traffic comes in?


Hey! I did the same with my first check that I got from Altavista, many years ago.

It was a $35 USD check and bank fees were higher than that amount, also in Europe.

I’ve it framed at my office and feel somewhat nostalgic every time I look at it.

Time flies!!


Because

1.- speakers do not need to know how to record their stuff and send it by some means.

2.- There is no need of somebody putting them all together before broadcasting.

As far as I understand, both processes are automated so that speakers just open the web app and record, and everything is ready on time.

Maybe it’d be a nice feature for services like Streamyard, allowing to introduce recorded videos in live events.


So instead of having to learn how to use recording software of some kind, they have to learn how to use this application, just for this one specific reason. I get the Idea, but i personally strongly dislike having to use lost of different app, which solve only one minor problem. But maybe this problem is way bigger for other people than it is for me, and i just underestimate the dimension of it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: