Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sean_'s comments login

same idea, yes

this seems simpler and more straight forward though


But yes, the LLM could go wrong because it's simply a wrapper around scripting claude code in non-interactive mode.

the immediate use cases are more towards automatically creating tests and documentation, as well as other non-destructive actions

such as read-only mode: https://github.com/RVCA212/codesys/blob/main/examples/exampl...


The source code is 155 lines.

You can vibe through asking cursor if it has any bugs and let me know or create a PR!

But by having 155 lines of source code and through continuous use of the sdk, I haven't experienced any problems

Actually this comment just gave me the idea of creating a file of codesys doing just this in its own repo!


> But by having 155 lines of source code and through continuous use of the sdk, I haven't experienced any problems

The number of lines of code being 155 lines is not an excuse to have zero tests, especially in an SDK and it doesn't mean it works.

It only means you know it 'works' on your machine and it may not work on someone else's or in another scenario.

> Actually this comment just gave me the idea of creating a file of codesys doing just this in its own repo!

Well, you've just proven my point.

The tests should be written first before you write the actual code and to just write them after the fact defeats the entire purpose of knowing what to test for and then assuming that it 'works'.


yea this boilerplate is super simple and effective. It's essentially mimicing how I use claude code and cursor, but with low level control.

A very cool thing I'm working on in this space is having an llm code with the codesys sdk, then run the code.

So imagine cursor coding a codesys file instead of doing the task directly so that it instead scripts claude code to do a sequence of actions and allows cursor/the user to simply analyze the results.

this also enables parralel claude code sessions which is super cool!


I never heard of Bob Loblaw, so no.

It's more a play on the phrase 'Code the thing that Codes the thing'


MCP Servers make it easy for LLMs to call tools. Since tools are mostly API calls, why not turn every API into an MCP Server tool?

This was my thesis behind building this feature into lmsystems.

The goal is simple:

- Add as many curl commands onto the site as possible and call them 'Tools'

- Combine them together into 'Servers' under 1 sse url

- Give every user the ability to do the same

I'm happy to say that we're nearly there !

I'm an indie hacker working on this completely alone so I would love feedback on how I can get the community more engaged and any features to add!

Also I'm interested in your thoughts on why this isn't going to work. What's going to kill this idea?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: