Default output for applications is set to BlackHole's virtual sound device which the "Ext-In / Track D" channel can pick up in Hosting AU as an input. An "AUDynamicsProcessor" and "AUGraphicEQ" stage later (both built-in macOS units) it is sent back to the real output device.
It was referenced in the article as "the orange site" however the reason for it initially being named as such is probably because of HNs system of trying to avoid popularity being artificially driven high. The details of this is as far as I know pretty scarce, but the idea is that if you try to get to the top of Hackernews they somehow detect that and penalize you. So people have taken to calling it "the orange site" in order to avoid this detection when talking about HN.
Not parent, but yes. 100% yes. It loads quickly, has great content density, lacks tons of JavaScript that tanks performance on slower machines, reminds me of the older, better times. For the same reason, many people still prefer the old Reddit UI compared to the new UI.
Oh, right. Well, that's easy: it's an orange site.
I've seen it typically (though not universally) used seemingly dismissively, so I've always assumed it was a euphemism. People very commonly refrain from naming a thing directly if they disapprove.
Data broadcasting companies did use scanlines originally intended for Teletext/Ceefax in the 90s to transmit public information (e.g. weather forecasts, water levels): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datacasting
In that case the "antenna in" signal did go to an ISA decoder card in the PC, but it appears that the BBC Micro also had an adapter for receiving classic Ceefax pages, some of which also contained software: https://www.teletext.mb21.co.uk/gallery/ceefax/telesoftware/
The early ~2008 Linux-supplied dirt cheap Acer Aspire One A110L netbooks came with small (8GB?) and horrifically slow SSDs.
Back in the days of such things, we'd upgrade the RAM and use Windows XP with the write filter to make them great little machines. There was an SD card slot in the side that would happily store files.
The SSDs were very limited in read-write cycles from what I remember. More noticeable they brutally slow at writing. By shoving all the writes into RAM instead of direct the SSD, everything ran more smoothly.
If you wanted to keep any changes (usually due to OS or software updates) then you ran a batch file that wrote out the changes to the SSD before shutdown. Otherwise you shut the machine down and all your changes were immediately forgotten.
reply