Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ritz_labringue's comments login

Why can't you just create a pool of databases and truncate all tables after each run ? That should be pretty fast


DELETE is faster on a small amount of data.

But yea, DELETEing is faster than creating a DB from template (depends on how much you have to delete, of course). However, templates allow parallelism by giving its test its own database. I ended up doing a mix of both: create a DB if there's not one available, or reuse one if available, always tearing down data.


TRUNCATE is faster than DELETE. You could have 100 dbs, each test first acquires one, runs, truncates, releases. No need to create more dbs on the fly.


researchers are paid 2x what engineers are paid at OAI, even if it's not the same job there's still one that is "higher level" than the other.


In terms of pay at OAI, sure.

But being an engineer isn’t just a lesser form of being a researcher.

It’s not a “level” in that sense. Like OAI isn’t going to fire an engineer and replace them with a researcher.


> Create a blockchain-based AI-powered VR platform that allows pet owners to monitor and interact with their pets remotely, providing real-time feedback on their health, behavior, and emotions. Incorporate web3 technology to ensure secure and transparent data management, and leverage VR/AR to create an immersive experience for both pets and owners. This startup idea taps into the growing trend of tech running through every industry, while also addressing the need for innovative solutions that benefit both pets and humans.

All I need now is a tool that will generate the YC application


Doesn't it cost hundreds of thousands of dollars just to train GPT-3 ? If so, that seems like a good reason to use a "managed" GPT-3.


Yes, but they didn't release the model after training and you can't take your weights with you if you finetune their model.

GPT Neo was trained at similar expense, and they released the weights. Use that.


First part is correct, the second part is not. GPT Neo is a 2.7B param model, the largest GPT is 175B (they have various flavours, up to 175B). I appreciate the sentiment and what ElutherAI is doing with GPT Neo, but there is no open source equivlenet of the full GPT-3 available for the public to use. Hopefuly it's just a matter of time.


GPT-J is 6B and comes pretty close. Also practically I haven’t noticed a difference.

Keep in mind there are also closed source alternatives: for example, AI21’s Jurassic-1 models are comparable, cheaper, and technically larger (albeit somewhat comically, 178B instead of 175B parameters).


Thanks ! Didn't know that. Isn't it also very expensive to run ?


I confirm that this product cannot be launched in France with this name


I concur. Colleagues are dying of laughter right now


We will consider a name change when we launch in French-speaking markets. Filon, for example, may be a suitable option.


It's risky between Fion and Fillon https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39135906


Your parent is specifically talking about greenfield projects that are not customer facing. Alexa/Echo is customer facing.


disclaimer: he was an investor in my startup

He spends a lot of his money on giving back: 42, a free programming bootcamp (https://www.42.fr/), Station F, a huge co-working space in Paris which hosts entrepreneurs for free (https://stationf.co/)

He also has a very active VC/Business Angel fund (he funds 2 early stage startups every week out of his own pocket). His telecom company (free) helped divide by 2 the average price of mobile plans in France.

All in all, his impact seems very positive, I'd love to understand why you think he is evil


If you pay for the premium/metal plan, the support is stellar as well (or at least, it has been for me)


Not sure why this is getting downvoted


Complaints about issues with page design appear frequently. There's a couple problems with them. One is that they distract from the topic of the submission, which is the reason why it's here. That's doubly the case when there aren't many comments yet, because threads are sensitive to initial conditions.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

The other reason is that there are only a few such complaints that get recycled over and over, so they tend to be repetitive. Curiosity withers under repetition, and curiosity is what this site is for.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

This doesn't mean that good page design isn't important, it means that part of the art of contributing well to a forum like HN is to resist bringing certain kinds of important things into the threads.


Thanks. This makes sense.


What does it have to do with the control key ?


Because control should be where caps lock is on most keyboards.

It is the one key re-map I cannot live without.

(Anyone who used a Sun keyboard for a considerable period time is familiar with this layout. I do not know if any other systems predated Sun in this regard.)


Sun (founded 1982) was certainly not the first. The Apple II (1977) put CTRL to the left of A, and every other II followed suit. I'm sure they weren't the first, either. The original IBM PC's Model F keyboard (1981) put control to the left of A, too.

The Macintosh didn't originally have a CTRL key, so Caps Lock went there. The first Mac to have CTRL seems to be the Macintosh II and SE, where you were offered the choice of the Apple Keyboard (control left of A) or Apple Extended Keyboard (caps lock left of A). Thus began decades of confusion.

Interestingly, the NeXT keyboard (1988) had no caps lock.


If you pressed Command and Shift, you activated "Shift Lock"


I always thought the position of the control key on the OLPC keyboard was a cute decision: http://wiki.laptop.org/images/1/1b/Keyboard_english.png

Several extra keys for typing useful symbols and non-english characters, and not a CapsLock in sight!


> (Anyone who used a Sun keyboard for a considerable period time is familiar with this layout. I do not know if any other systems predated Sun in this regard.)

I believe the ASR33 may be the originator of Ctrl to the left of A:

https://www.bytecollector.com/images/asr-33_vcf_02.jpg

Other influential terminals such as the DEC VT series, and the ADM-3A also placed Ctrl along the home row (although on many of the DEC keyboards, there were two keys in the modern Caps Lock position - Ctrl to the left, and Caps Lock on the right).

Many early home computers had Ctrl in this position, including the Apple II and the original IBM PC.

The very first Sun workstation used a keyboard with the same layout as the DEC VT100, it then evolved into the more well known Sun layout, which later inspired the Happy Hacking Keyboard,


I believe the old space cadet keyboards did, and also that that is why emacs prioritizes the C- prefix for major chords.


Because ctrl is important for terminal users, but Mac keyboards have it only in a very awkward almost unreachable place - so remapping caps lock to ctrl is a very common fix (which is supported natively in the settings app, too).


I have my control key mapped to caps lock and can't go back at this point.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: