(IANAL) That demonstrates the opposite: that's a voluntary system with no force of law behind it—the private sector "self-regulating" itself, if you will.
The film rating systems were created under threat of legislation in the first half of the 20th century (so, in lieu of actual legislation). The transformative 1st Amendment rulings of the Warren Court would have made such laws unconstitutional after the 1960's, but the dynamic that created these codes predates that—predates the modern judicial interpretation of the 1st Amendment.
Yes it really was quite good despite all the hate it seems to get in internet comments. I used it for several years. The feature set, particularly config specs and dynamic views, was brilliant. The product was pretty mature and complete 25 years ago. I agree that administration was complicated and performance could be slow if misconfigured. We configured right, it was very intuitive and pleasant to use. IBM has effectively killed it by continuing to charge an excessive premium while adding nothing significant since they bought Rational (for Clearcase, DOORS, Apex etc.)
> The big argument against kafka-delta-ingest was Apache Kafka. If an organization has Kafka for other reasons, then kafka-delta-ingest can be a useful “sidecar” process to persist data flowing through Kafka. If however the organization is running Kafka just for ingestion, there are cheaper options available. As the organization evolved, the other consumers of Kafka drifted away, driving the value proposition of kafka-delta-ingest lower and lower.
> We can expect videos of unpopular minorities, doing horrible things
While manipulation of photos exist, and real photos misattributed are very common, for the most part a lot of that does happen as well. And some people are too quick to ignore or gloss over it
I'm sure this will be exactly the popular attitude - yes, the evidence and videos people see and form emotional reactions based on are fake, but the problem is real and so we should let it slide and just assume something exactly like the AI video happened anyway.
I think it is generally pretty effective for most people. Science says it is roughly comparable to hycosine.
For me, I find that one Dramamine I (dimenhydrinate) pill is very effective at preventing motion sickness, but it will put me to sleep quite reliably a couple hours later. Two pills and I can play Unreal Tournament 2004 until I'm too tired to sit up. I'd be quite concerned though with 3 or 4 pills about hallucinations -- and from my understanding, the hallucinations you get on dimenhydrinate are not good.
Dramamine II (aka Less Drowsy), which is meclizine, is a little less effective but usually adequate, but still reliably makes me really sleepy the rest of the day.
Kwells (hycosine) is the least effective overall for me, but I can take a little more if I need to, and it does not make me drowsy at all. I would take original dramamine every time based on effectiveness if not for the drowsy part.
reply