There is room for nuanced conversation here. If the status quo in this thread is "violence is never justified" then I feel that flaggers and downvoters should justify their position with more nuance when confronted by a litany of human history that runs opposite of that notion.
I wonder at which point you consider locking this thread, if even a simple question asking for precision on a viewpoint is being flagged and downvoted.
What curious conversation is happening outside of the normal thoughts and prayers top comment and inane one-liner quotes. Seems like the mods had no problem whatsoever letting the other politically motivated assassinations get flagged away and removed swiftly. How interesting.
Forgive me if I will not celebrate this man's life.
This site is a consevative and fascist bastion that masquerades as an open and free thought forum. Your personal moderation efforts are evidence for that. That you timed me out for so long after unflagging the comment indicative of your bad faith.
It would certainly interesting to have a greater diversity of moderators, for instance if this platform runs techno-centric (reflecting the beliefs and biases of managers and corporations in the tech industry) then maybe some academic, scholarly, and/or public intellectual type of person so as to balance out the implicit editorial voice that is inevitable in any online moderation scheme.
I'm sure there's multiple depending on what angle you want to take. Historically, it's been "USA is not the only developed country that has had this problem, but it is the only one that hasn't solved it." Maybe with a dash of "Guns are the number one cause of death for children."
I was personally referencing gun control (and mental health interventions), but there are surely lots of others too when it comes to this particular problem.
Obviously this would help immensely, but this wasn't happening in the 90s when kids would bring guns to school for show and tell. Whatever changed, the better solution is to reverse that. What do you think?
Obviously I'm talking about reversing shootings, that's not possible. I'm talking about the culture that's developed, that has led to more angry kids. Angry enough to shoot their classmates. Wouldn't reversing that culture be the ultimate solution? Banning guns only delays the symptoms of this anger.
Flat, closed-minded positions like this are why the USA is the only developed country that enjoys the privilege of regularly burying bullet-ridden children.
We can have gun control. We can limit the damage that civilian weapons can do, while also keeping hunting and defense, as many countries do. Anyone who says that guns have any legitimate purpose beyond that (overthrowing governments) is deluding themselves. We reserve plenty of weapons for military use only.
The observation is, humans tend to think that annihilation is inevitable, it hasn't happened yet so therefore it will never be inevitable.
In fact, _anything_ could happen. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
If you need cognitive behavioral therapy, fine.
But to casually cite nuclear holocaust as something people irrationally believed in as a possibility is dishonest. That was (and still is) a real possible outcome.
Whats somewhat funny here is is if youre wrong, it doesnt matter. But that isnt the same as being right.
> Something in our makeup revels in the thought that we'll be the last generation of humans, that the future is gone and everything will come to a crashing stop
And yet there _will_ (eventually) be one generation that is right.
The Fermi Paradox might want to have a word here...
Particularly considering the law of large numbers in play where incalculable large chances have so far shown only one sign of technologically-capable life —— ours, and zero signs of any other example of a tech species evolving into something else or even passing the Great Filter.
The Fermi Paradox overestimates the likelihood of intelligent life outside of earth. We haven't even found hard evidence of life anywhere outside of our planet. There's not even a verifiably hospitable planet for water-based lifeforms anywhere within dozens of lightyears from earth. Even if a hospitable planet exists within a range we can one day get to, unless it has the same volcanic properties and makeup as earth, it's most probable that life itself never even developed there.
Even where life may have developed, it's incredibly unlikely that sentient intelligence developed. There was never any guarantee that sentience would develop on Earth and about a million unlikely events had to converge in order for that to occur. It's not a natural consequence of evolution, it's an accident of Earth's unique history and several near-extinction level events and drastic climate changes had to occur to make it possible.
The "law of large numbers" is nothing when the odds of sentient intelligence developing are so close to zero. If such a thing occurred or occurs in the future at some location other than Earth, it's reasonably likely that it's outside of our own galaxy or so far from us that we will never meet them. The speed of light is a hell of a thing.
Care to elaborate? The fed during both trump and Biden governments printed a ton of money for covid relief and stimulus, which caused inflation in bidens government.
You made the initial unsubstantiated claim. Please explore all the causes of inflation during the global pandemic: supply chain issues, (yes) stimulus spending, housing shortages, greedflation, the Russia invasion of Ukraine, etc.
Why does the ARP stick out to you as being what led this inflation, or even a net negative? Please consider the positive impacts and don't forget that the US recovered from COVID faster than other advanced economies. For however inflation screwed the working American, the ARP directly enabled these folks to pay bills, and buy things they wouldn't otherwise have been able to, screening them even more. Economists say the stimulus directly prevented deflation, which hit some other economies hard, like Japan.
Giving working people the ability to raise families, buy homes and go to school to get a good job is what supports the American dream and is what will make America thrive. Increasingly, these things are out of reach, but the ARP reminded people that enabling the American dream is a policy choice. If you think government giving support to Americans is an issue, first look at cutting support targeted toward the capital owning class.
Most people do not spend thousands of hours building something "not knowing what they're building."
On the contrary, in my experience it's much more important to "play" with a concept and see it working. Too many engineers think they're going to architect a perfect solution without ever getting code on the page.
A slapdash prototype is worth the weight of 100 tests and arch diagrams.
Note: I'm not saying the latter is not important. My comment is, it's ok (and encouraged) to do potentially throwaway work to understand the domain better.
> Most people do not spend thousands of hours building something "not knowing what they're building."
They sure do in my experience.
> On the contrary, in my experience it's much more important to "play" with a concept and see it working...
I agree with all that. That's the point: figure out what you're trying to do before building it. Of course you will not know everything up-front, and of course you would try things out to learn and progress, and, for anything that it's tiny, of course it makes sense to do this iteratively, working from the most pressing/important/risky points earlier.
Yeah good call, I missed that. I don't think there's a correct answer here, but it could be another step of the read or write. Either it would do another lookup of "my daughter" -> Name on read, or do a lookup on write if you already have a "my daughter is Name" memory. Whatever's less expensive in the long run. The graph memory someone else mentioned also seems like a good option there.
Why is this post flag worthy? I'm just asking questions. I thought we should be able to do that????
reply