The real article title says there is an association, while the HN title says there is causation ("Sitting for a long time shrinks your brain even if you exercise"). Very bad
I can't even reply to your comment without my words being stolen and used to train "AI". I have no option to opt out. So you will only get this chilled response.
You are really claiming that Google doesnt want your data? And claiming that big companies in general don't want your data? It's so absurd that i am not sure i understand your comment correctly.
It is an absolute 100% guarantee that Google wants your data
I think the person you're replying to is trying to make the point that people are generally OK with this, as long as it does not have an adverse impact on their personal lives. The hacker cloning the hard drive is likely to leverage this data to defraud or blackmail them, but Google et. al are not.
This is like the 'I have nothing to hide' argument against strict privacy measures. Individual bits of your information may not have much value. But the aggregate of all your information is something else. It may yield data that you don't expect it to contain. I can easily get your health, wealth, politics, relationship and even your exact address from it even if you never mention any of it. And the ways in which they can be used against you is also something you're unlikely to consider unless you're in a profession that does it - law enforcement, insurance companies, racial profilers, PR companies, lobbyists, ...
Another issue is that you are just worried about only your own data. But if Cambridge Analytica is any lesson, its that an entire section of a population can be targeted all at once using such data. And the outcome is no less disastrous than targeting individuals.
> They want some statistics. Not my personal information
I can guarantee you that's wrong - after the shenanigans they pulled to force me to register my CC and to prevent its deletion. But what's more pertinent here is that statistics is a sort of mathematical summary of a raw data. And that summary changes (into a different type of information) based on the statistical analysis you do on the raw data. I don't think you need an elaboration for this. But this is precisely the reason I believe that they will keep all your personal data in their raw form for as long as their resources permit.
> Maybe they want it for a good cause, who knows?
As they say, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...
That's hardly a corroboration of your assertion. Google is a targeted ad company who offers free and paid services as a honeypot for personal data. Numerous prior incidents prove that. Giving them the benefit of the doubt is imprudent at this stage.
Hong Kong protestors were tracked by looking at their purchases of public transport tickets. Canada froze the bank accounts of those involved in protests also. Wikileaks had to rely on cryptocurrency for funding and donations could be tracked otherwise. From this I see a trend that shows it is critical for democracy, don't you?
Cointelegraph very often exaggerates and writes in an inaccurate way, it should never be used as a reliable source of information. You can see the real information here which makes it clear that it only applies to exchanges: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
Haveno already works by providing p2p multisignature escrow. With this design, you need to match with an individual and do a direct exchange. There is a Tor-based application
BasicSwap has another model with noncustodial atomic swaps and some sort of decentralised orderbook.
I expect that Serai will be much more effective than those. It will launch soon with a liquidity pool design, similar to Uniswap for Ethereum. With this model, other people can profit by providing liquidity for pools. It will be very easy for anyone to initiate a trade and do an exchange for a different currency from the pool. It will be incorporated into the most popular mobile app Cakewallet, so it should be accessible even for non-technical users and quickly gain adoption. I think this has the potential to provide an even more convenient, generally superior experience compared to centralised exchanges.
I just read the section in his book that the article refers to and within context it doesnt say anything that the article suggests. It doesn't say anywhere that he believes in the noxious vapors of miasma theory or that he doesnt believe germs exist. Did you read it? Can you quote where he says he doesnt believe in germ theory?
I am not sure he even misunderstands miasma theory. At a certain point in history, miasma theorists were incorrect about the exact mechanisms for spreading disease — they didn’t understand the concept of disease vectors in the environment, like mosquitoes — but their drainage and sanitation solutions were highly successful. I think that is what he refers to with statements like "miasma’s approach to medicine". At worst it seems like he may have used the term 'miasma theory' in a different way than is typical, which hardly justifies the claims in the article.
The section of his book ends with this: "As a final side note, it seems to me that a mutually respectful science-based, evidence-based marriage incorporating the best of these two clashing dogmas would best serve public health and humankind". How can he write that if he doesn't believe in germ theory as the headline clearly implies? He is looking at the history of science and making deeper statements about the general approaches to studying the spread of disease. I think the article seems to willfully and intentionally misrepresent the text.
Essentially the same for me, I had one incident where someone was arguing in favor of it and then immediately embarrassed themselves badly because they were misled by a chatgpt error. I have the feeling that this hype will collapse as this happens more and people see how bad the consequences are when there are errors
Even in 2012 bitcoin could very concretely be used to order drugs. Many people have used it to transact and preserve value in hostile economic environments. Etc etc. Ridiculous comment.
Personally i have still yet to find LLMs useful at all with programming.
