Seems fun that most of the huge engineering effort seems to have gone into making the device feel as if its not there, Passthrough, Persona, EyeSight, and most of the downsides in the review comes from the fact that the device is still there.
The device is a simulation of the dream device that can overlay UI on top of your vision without you looking any different to those around you, I wonder how far away that is.
I don't think it needs to be 100% not-there to reach full popularity, in the shape of glasses or a hat would be good enough, or perhaps something you can put on top of your regular glasses.
>How did they do it? As it turns out, crime. Unable to reverse engineer the chip, Tengen convinced the United States Copyright Office to hand over the source code of the lockout chip, claiming it was necessary for a lawsuit. With the code in hand, Tengen could make their own clone with ease. And Tengen was going to sue Nintendo for antitrust violations, so they probably figured they could get away with it.
I dont see many suggestions of a better way to do things. We can always find the flaws in the way things are but that doesnt mean they’re not optimal. When I learned this the first time it was just either agile or waterfall, if agile is so bad are we saying that waterfall would be better for all these situations?
My opinion is that agile needs to be agile, in that we have to adapt ways of working based on the team’s situation, what were working on, how well resourced we are … and have agility to change how we do things to optimise our work based on those constraints.
I think it would have more to do with Fiber to the Node allowing ISPs to only half-upgrade their infrastructure and still achieve workable broadband, even if having the foresight to do straight fiber would have been a much better goal to work towards at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlankPage