There are indeed no emojis on that comment for me, are you using a different client?

I can actually see the emoji for number 4 on iOS Safari.

It’s in the 3rd line, the one before the website url (penultimate).

On Firefox Windows I see the number 4 with some line over it.

I'm running a custom ROM on a Galaxy S8 (so without project treble) and I've been pleasantly surprised!

Even something as niche as the swipe on fingerprint sensor to pull notifications drawer down still works!

Everything from phone calls, camera, fingerprint, all the essentials work pretty much flawlessly.

Which custom ROM?

LineageOS, the "successor" to CyanogenMod of the day

I have been always stuck with C99, what is the "post" C23 way that will zero initialize a full union?

Or am I misunderstanding this?

`={}` in place of `={0}` is the new option in C23.

IANAL stands for "I am not a lawyer"

This reminded me of this one time my father used the term "annales" which in french apparently means "past exams" or something :P

I this this ought to be an iterative process, such as study principles so that you don't start from absolute scratch, then make a wheel that sucks, study some more and do more resarch yourself, rince and repeat until satisfied.

There is so much nuance that doesn't get captured in all the study you can do about how a certain thing is made.

Even with numbers, some locales use a comma `,` as the decimal seperator, and some use the dot `.` so that can cause headaches out of the box.

Can someone point to where i can read some context?

DigiCert's legal threat, while obviously biased towards DigiCert, gives some context: https://bug1950144.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9468...

For further reading, consider these two incidents which resulted in delayed revocation from DigiCert and a bunch of comments about how DigiCert should not be allowing delayed revocation:

- Incident report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1894560, delayed revocation report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1896053 - incident due to the issuance of some certificates with incorrectly-capitalized phrases in the certificate's Business Category field; baseline requirements require revocation within five days but DigiCert dragged that out much further

- Incident report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910322, delayed revocation report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1910805, DigiCert information page https://www.digicert.com/support/certificate-revocation-inci... - incident due to incorrect CNAME-based domain validation (failure to check that the CNAME started with an underscore); baseline requirements require revocation within 24 hours but DigiCert was stopped by the TRO and revoked after five days.

Essentially, DigiCert has been delaying the revocation process (twice now) and people are unhappy about that. DigiCert has apparently attempted to silence those unhappy people (Sectigo and their representative Tim Callan) with legal action.

I don't believe that that's a legal filing. DigiCert never filed anything with the courts. That's just a letter to Sectigo threatening to sue.

Whoops, sorry, should've said legal threat not filing - fixed.

Did you perhaps forgot to edit and add the link? I'm interested in hearing about that

I hope you speak German.

If you download the .mp4 you will notice it is 'deu-eng-fra', there is an English overdub available as a separate audio track.

Hi. Care to share the source code perhaps?

I think the middle ground of generating code using MX and taking it from there using cmake is a really good place to start.