Use AI to write anything and you become confined to whatever "moral code" the model has been taught to follow. Once a critical mass is reached, whoever controls these models, will control what is being said.
The reason why they provide it, is because everyone expects it. The reason everyone expects it, is because it was "cool" and an ecosystem grew around it. I use AWS ECS and it's really really good and easy to understand.
Sounds like something massively over-engineered and sold to the government by a consultancy. Intel loves this because it puts the client's data in a cage which is locked from the inside, and they must keep buying servers with Intel chips no matter what.
What? USD is already the dominant stablecoin. The US should be jumping for joy that they will remain the universal fiat even through the blockchain age.
When Uniswap removed a bunch of coins from their front end, guess what they removed? sAUD, sEUR... but not sUSD. Very interesting don't you think?
Ha! I hadn't seen this particular paranoia-mixed-with-delusions-of-grandiosity for a while. In the first year or so of Bitcoin, the community was absolutely obsessed with the idea that "the Fed's" will come for them, to protect the mighty dollar. They were also certain they could withstand such efforts, since their fancy tech operated outside the reaches of the law.
They were wrong on both counts: "the establishment" didn't react with aggressive attempts to shut them down, but really just some mild interest mixed with a bit of amusement.
Only when, after a decade+, it had been proven beyond any doubt that the technology isn't useful for anything anyone cares about, and when it became more salient that the energy usage and the scale of fraud were growing out of control did they start pushing back. And with every single startup in the sector operating within the confines of law and the existing financial markets, there is absolutely no doubt that the law can regulate and/or shut down the industry within any reasonable meaning of the term.
Yeah, they can but they won’t. They’ll institutionalize everything you hate so much about the crypto markets today, and force you to invest in it by destroying your savings account, your house, and your 401k. Centralized fake crypto is the next big population-level banking scam.
The original paper describes that the reduction in working hours has forced the workforce to develop a more efficient way of working. Thus, they have accomplished what should have been accomplished with having better management from the get go.
Given this is the government we're talking about - it isn't really that surprising, is it? They could have reduced the workforce by 20% and accomplished a similar result, while reducing costs.
Unfortunately the procurement rules currently in place prevent procurement personnel evaluating a tender from taking into account any prior performance. I'm unsure whether this is a result of EU legislation and common market rules, or whether it is just the UK.
italy has legislation to forbid people who engaged in corruption/embezzlement from working with public administrations.
It also has a required certification for companies that work with the public that they weren't condemned for certain crimes (trafficking in illegal waste, extorsion, organized crime etc).
So, it doesn't seem an EU/Single Market rule that you can't check this.
https://github.com/jasiek/webprog-anytone