Thanks for the shoutout :)

GPT Gmail and GPT Workspace, using GPT in the google docs, slides, sheets and auto responder for Gmail.

https://workspace.google.com/u/0/marketplace/app/gpt_for_gma...

https://workspace.google.com/u/0/marketplace/app/gpt_for_doc...

https://gpt.space

The best part is not even about the money but about having a lot of users, democratising GPT and saving a lot of human hours everyday!

When did you launch? Seems like very good revenue if you launched recently and already reached 2000/month considering the low price and high cost of the OpenAI API.

Edit: Your T&C says it was written in 2019, you can't possibly been running the project since then right? https://gpt.space/terms-of-service

Don't trust any numbers here blindly sir.

Without verification you don't know if any of them are marking $2k+

Hence the additional questions :) Making $2k+ in just a month (GPT4 API access opened for invite-only) would mean a ton of users quickly, which is hard to believe.

The apps have over 250k installs you can see on the Marketplace listings

The website looks down :(

I love libgen will switch to your version for sure :)

It is available over IPFS. Do you have a client installed and running?

EDIT: if you do have IPFS and the companion extension then libgen.crypto should resolve to something like `http://libgen.crypto.ipns.localhost:8080/` which currently works as advertised.

It's not a Web-site. It is more suitable to call it antisite since it has no single location where its content is hosted.

To access it, you need to use software given in the description

https://libgen.fun/dweb.html

yes

It will diverge.

Exactly the problem that I have. Many edge cases too.

All and all it is a non trivial problem. You have at the very least have to attach some kind of form of reputation system into the verification process. Even with that you will still have the "misunderstood genius" issue, or the "excellent reputation professor" that everyone trust without (enough) verification.

But at least there’s be a system for other researchers to record “failed to replicate” that could give a channel to critique reputable professors that’s not controlled by the same professors (as they often can in journals).

I think only www.xirva.org has valid certificate, maybe Firefox strips the www for some reason.

Since it was for a ETHGlobal hackathon I thought it would be fun to experiment with the feature where we mint an NFT where the metadata points to the IPFS link. You could then do whatever you do with an NFT.

I wonder how much information do you get from arxiv regarding the dependency graph via citations. Could there be a way that I, as I upload my own manuscript, to tip the authors of the people I citated and conversely someday have the possibility of also generating revenue personally as such? It would be much nicer, I think, if the fees that are currently paid to journals to instead go to the authors that also contributed to my work.

There are for sure interesting ideas related to new forms of scientific funding. The issue I have and why the project is currently on standby is how to combat spam/hoax articles

Not all articles are uploaded yet, it is still WIP.

is search still a WIP?

Everything is still WIP, very difficult to do rich indexing on IPFS files. A new project idea ?