Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hananova's comments login

A GB emulator is definitely not a weekend project if your goal is any kind of accuracy. And even if it was, that doesn't devalue the project or effort that went into it.


I have written my own game for the original game boy[1] with the goal of bringing very modern tetris (Think Tetris the Grand Master) to a retro system. It's free and open source. Though the sound seems to not work well on the emulator in parent. I've tested it on real hardware and it is definitely an emulator bug.

1. https://github.com/Villadelfia/dmgtris


If approved, it will be published in the “staatsblad” in Dutch, French, and German.


Hah well I would hope so!

But do we even know if it's a law, royal decree, or ministerial decree? Will it be receiving parliamentary scrutiny? Do we know if it's in process or already enacted? If a decree that amends another decree, do we at least have an idea where the consolidated (as-amended) version is?


ChatGPT Deep Research mode was pretty thorough, but couldn't find the proposal document yet. Plausibly this was still an internal document being circulated for review before being submitted?


That's my best guess. Oddest thing is that eID appears to be under their interior ministry, but that's not in the portfolio of the minister identified?


This makes complete sense, we have the system and both itsme and eID readers can be made to only provide age and a uuid. If implemented correctly this would be both secure and privacy preserving.


I'd rather keep the government out of the loop completely.


Interesting!

Is that UUID also bound to just the requesting site? (that is to say: can't be matched to an ID on a different site?).

Do you happen to know where to find docs?


So, he's "The Founder" (title) but not "the founder" (concept). Got it.


Most compilers will compile both the three xor version and three variable version to the same machine code anyway, since modern cpu's have swap instructions.


There's a reason why the document says "Doxxed me with a real-world identity" and not "Doxxed me with MY real-world identity." It's because she was doxxed, but the doxxing was wrong.


"Doxxing" refers to providing the real world identity of a psuedononymous person, breaking their pseudoanonymity.

It doesn't refer to providing the WRONG identity, as that wouldn't break their pseudoanonymity. You, hananova -- are the QUEEN OF FRANCE! Did I doxx you or not? I don't believe I did.

You can't have it both ways. Either Hector Martin is Asahi Lina (which he is), and Luna revealed this to Martin's chagrin, and Martin published a document to try and trash Luna's reputation as a clumsy attempt at damage control, or Luna didn't reveal Martin's barely-concealed secret and no need to publish the document.

By publishing the document, we know which interpretation is correct.


The problem is that there are many places where non-convincing counterfeits are NOT accepted, which is (at least part of) the reason why there are so many convincing counterfeits now.


In the case of Pokemon or MTG, it's very important that the back of the cards look the same across the years and generations, so that the opponent can't see what the other player is playing. Of course, with MTG people often use card sleeves so it's a bit moot.


Writing the name of the card you want it to be in sharpie on the front of a real (but cheap) card trivially solves this problem for cases where card sleeves are not in use.


If it's an 8-pin socket, that's perhaps for a dual op-amp.


My boss has been trying to bully me to RTO for several months now. Unfortunately for him, he promised me verbally that this job was remote forever during the interview, and where I live verbal contracts are just as valid as contracts on paper.

Because of their bully tactics I've essentially been paid for doing absolutely nothing at home for 2 months now. They can't fire me for cause, because they did contract with me under the stipulation of WFH, and they can't lay me off without cause because they know perfectly well that I can and will sue them if they do because the reason is obvious even if not explicitly stated.

I guess the point of this post is that companies will cut off their nose to spite their face.


I'm sure this'll help provide them with a positive view on remote positions.


Who cares what they think? If they operate like this they won’t exist much longer.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: