Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | greendestiny's commentslogin

You can get chatGPT to generate plantUML


Disclosing vulnerabilities.


They should definitely disclose vulnerabilities in American made software for SIGSEC. If it’s foreign then not disclosing it would be SIGINT


If the software is foreign made and used in US, americans are still vulnerable. And opensource isn't American/national


The problem with that is there's a lot of software that's American made that is also used by potential targets of SIGINT.


I think the theory is suggesting that the photon was emitted with less energy.


I think the question is that if the current accepted theory for the redshift is correct, then where has the energy gone?


Would the star then appear to be a different color to "someone" its own solar system than it does us? Does OUR star thus appear to be moving TOWARD them since it's "our" color vs what "they" would consider to be the correct color for a star our size?


Doesn’t this require the photon to be emitted differently depending on where it ends up, as it would experience different amounts of redshift depending on the length of flight?

That’s some serious retro-causality if a photon from 13B ly hits us instead of Andromeda.


You and me both. :(


Actually despite your skepticism Tesla's PR spin has already beaten you.

"but autopilot still lowers the death rate on average"

That's not what they said, they said the death rate was lower than the average. And yet you can't help hearing that it lowered the death rate. I think it's very likely turning on autopilot massively increases the rate of death for Tesla drivers, but they've managed to deflect from that so skilfully.


I don't get it. These two are the same thing.


The comment above you supposes that people who drive teslas have fewer accidents on average, even without autopilot. Saying that autopilot "lowers the average" would mean that autopilot lowers the amount of accidents for tesla drivers, while "lower than average" could mean that while a tesla with autopilot is safer than the average, it is less safe than a tesla without autopilot. Pretty complicated


Hah!


I don't think it's going to emerge without significant effort to make it happen. I think most of the 'intelligence' we desire will be attainable without sentience. Sentience itself will require a lot of specific research directed at the goal. It's certainly a risk though.


Right there with you on this, love react's rendering model. Redux seems to get all the hype but I'm sort of beginning to suspect it might be mostly the wrong way to do things. It reminds me of TDD, most of the benefits seem to be moral in character rather than concrete.


Yeah but in defence of the guy you're replying to, once you render them they are 2d images.


And before that they're 3D models.


You can try it yourself with commercial software: http://www.123dapp.com/catch

Scale can be hard to capture in photogrammetry, but in general the unrealness probably has more to do with the somewhat smoothed out (triangulated) surface that doesn't capture too fine a level of detail and the textureless (uncoloured) model they are rendering.


No need for commercial software! Try VisualSFM, Insight3D, Regard3D!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: