Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fferen's comments login

I first started coding in high school on the TI-84 calculators. My 1st language was TI-BASIC, 2nd was Z80 assembly - quite a big step - and I quit when I faced some tricky bugs that my teenage self could not figure out :-) Back then, I don't believe they had a C/C++ toolchain. Some time later, I tried using Small Device C compiler (SDCC), but encountered several compiler bugs which I couldn't fix but duly reported. Great to see there is such excellent tooling nowadays.


Disagree with first example. If that condition is only used once, adding a variable introduces more state to keep track of, that could just be a comment next to the conditional.


On the topic of calculator font bugs, Google's calculator randomly switches between two fonts:

https://pasteboard.co/lmbr4iE6BJej.png

https://pasteboard.co/sU3GA5psIaT0.png


Hard to know if you're referring to Chromebook/Android/Web, but looks like the web one. If that's the calculator from the google.com web-page, that is surely a stylesheet/font that failed to load (sometimes?). Try to look at the browser developer console next time it happens for some request errors.


The first one is worse because the 0 looks more like an O. What platform?


Edge on Mac, but IIRC it happens on Windows as well. Just checked in firefox/mac and seems OK.


Fails to mention the actual reason people are fascinated: their diversity of appearance. Typical AI summary with many words not saying very much.


So does the article, because it's about speciation not humans. The summary doesn't describe this article at all.


Reminds me of TI-BASIC for the TI-83 graphing calculators... The closing ')' is optional at the end of a line, and omitting it could make your program slightly faster...


Idea: deplane by row. Each row leaves when a light in that row turns on. An algorithm decides when to turn them on based on several factors: keeping large groups together, expected speed of deplaning (eg. elderly may be slower), current occupancy of the aisle. Advantage: should be very fast, easy to follow, groups stay together.


My tentative advice would be to find the one with the best reviews. Only pay attention to the lowest reviews, even a few 1-stars are informative.

My story: I brush and floss every single day. At my regular checkup, the dentist measured 2-5mm gum depths, and insisted on doing a deep cleaning, which involves anesthesia and multiple visits. I argued that the 5mm depths were borderline, and could very well be 4mm with measurement error. (They did seem to be pushing rather hard.) They also pointed out some tiny supposed "pockets" on the X-ray that looked like just imaging blur or something. Feeling very suspicious, I left, and found another dentist with, surprisingly, zero bad reviews on Yelp. They measured 2-4mm gum depths, and did a much less aggressive cleaning.


When I started grad school in semiconductor electronics, I noticed everyone pronounced it "si-li-cun", while normal people usually say "si-li-con". Maybe it's just a west coast thing.


My impression was always that this was an east/west-coast thing. I could be wrong!


Sir Francis Bay Con would like a word with you.


Like finance/finance


For those who are curious, "fine-ance" / "fin-ance"


To me, those are the verb and the noun respectively.

"He will finance the project." "The project got its finance."

With silicon, I think I stress the first syllable, if any.


Whether it's c'n or cahn, the first syllable gets the stress; that is not the issue.

I would say that the project got its financing, or maybe that it became financed. Finance as a noun is the whole field of handling money (Bob works in finance). I pronounce it all starting with "fine".


Huh interesting, I definitely make that distinction for "refuse" but not "finance". That's from an Australian English speaker though.


It's the same for me (a US English speaker raised on the east coast who lived on the west coast for a decade).

I also wouldn't pronounce "financing" as "financeing", and I don't recall ever hearing a fellow American pronounce it that way, even if they might say "finance".


At least from the graph, it's leveling out?


I hate that graph. Not only is it not zero-based, a common mistake made by amateurs and people trying to mislead, but you can't even tell where zero is, even though the author of the graph clearly must know. They tell us in the text that 3 billion is one-third of the total. But if you didn't already know that, the graph would be meaningless. Suppose the total number of birds in 1970 was 3 trillion. Then the loss would be a tenth of a percent, which is negligible. You just can't tell by looking at that stupid graph.


https://diffxweyl.wordpress.com/

Theoretical physics blog. Something for everyone.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: