Used to have a structured one: - what have I done; - what I am going to do - misc/additional information/personal development

Definitely a good introduction but defining it a "A Practical Guide to Zero-Trust Security" is an over statement

not a coder here but if you will need a security architect (focused on cloud security) feel free to drop an email to fabrizio [at] fdicarlo (dot) com

Eric Schmidt was a great CEO, has led to success as a startup that Google is now the undisputed leader among search engines and offers a multitude of services (not counting those that are developing "Offer", the Social Network by Called Google "GoogleME, " and so on). In your opinion, when is the time where you have to CEO from outside the birth of the startup?

I understand your concerns about the accounts (among other things, mine is newer) but I took the opportunity to sign up on HN (before I read only)to rate this story of a group to which I belong and that I find interesting. I wrote "Great Group!" because I find it useful, we talk about success stories, we exchanged views, opinions and demonstrates that the Startups Scene is not just in Silicon Valley

sure! you find it useful. But why? If you would have explained all this instead of saying "Great Group!", you wouldn't have been downvoted.

You see, on HN we try to explain what we are saying and don't take much on face value. Also a two word comment is usually replaced by an upvote.

Oh ok, sorry, I try to fix my reputation (or karma) ASAP :)

Who said anything about your karma? I never look at anyone's karma before judging. What you wrote was crap and go downvoted. Thats all there is to it.