lol, lmao, author clearly does not understand what a tech writer (or any writer) actually does and how they're important.

wish they wouldn't

I would assume not because you can do the same thing using a CLI apple installs on all macs, sips

    sips -s format jpeg in.heic --out out.jpeg

also, a heic is just a container around an h265 image frame

the language in this is entirely smarmy ai boosterisms, all the anti ai arguments it uses are things no real person has ever said and no real person ever would.

love the immediate transphobia, really tells me exactly what you're all about

the author has shown himself not to be an ally in this piece.

misleading headline, kosa had nothing to do about child safety and everything to do with government censorship, anybody framing it as "child safety" is a rube falling for the oldest conservative christian play in the book.

january sixth was not the reichstag fire, it was the beer hall putsch

Is it inefficient? Possibly. But I would argue trying to get me to use an IDE and all of the other new fancy tools is more inefficient. My flow works for me, I can navigate through projects and find exactly what I'm looking for pretty quickly, to the point where people who watch me do it comment on how it just looks like a blaze of text to them. And I've found that trying to use IDEs and other tools doesn't make me more efficient, it just slows me down.

I want to be clear, I don't think my workflow is the best, most good, better than everyone else's. But it is mine, and it's the one I'm very proficient and productive with. Vim, tmux, and an assortment of command line tools isn't the right workflow for everybody, but I would argue I'm as, if not more, productive than most people I know using that latest fancy IDE tools.

> Why don't you use automation to help your job when the whole point of your job is automation?

Because I don't see that as automation, I see it as things getting in my way. My brain is set in its ways, and when I try to use tab completion or other nice editing things that people like I feel so slow, I feel like the computer is putting blockers in my way, because I know exactly the line I want to write, and popups and tab-complete break that flow for me.

All power to everyone who can handle that and prefer it, but it's not for me.

IDEs are neither new nor fancy. I find it really amusing how many programmers spurn IDEs. It makes me think of a engineer refusing to use CAD.

> And I've found that trying to use IDEs and other tools doesn't make me more efficient, it just slows me down.

I am sorry to insist on this, but you're clearly mistaken: it's literally impossible for your grep workflow to be faster than hitting `Cmd+b` (IntelliJ MacOS shortcut to go to definition if you're on a symbol, or to see usages if you're on a definition).

> when I try to use tab completion

You don't use tab-completion even on the terminal?

> and popups and tab-complete break that flow for me.

It's very easy to turn off popups and make auto-complete only show up when you explicitly request it. In fact, that's the first thing I do on my IDEs. I highly recommend spending some time changing the IDE settings so that you're happy with how much "automatic" stuff it does. The amount of help an IDE gives is just immeasurable. I do sometimes have to write code without one and it feels like walking on glass. Even running a particular test, for example, is difficult, while in the IDE you just, again, hit a shortcut while your cursor is on the test. I know approximately how to do that from the terminal, but ffs that's useless knowledge to have when I just don't have to write code without an IDE at all, and using the terminal would take minutes (even if you're super fluent in it, as you're forced to come up with a regex for the particular test you want to run or just type the entire name, without assistance) rather than a fraction of a second, while distracting me from what I was even trying to do. This is one example, I could give hundreds more.

"that works"..... while not linking to something using the protocol, just linking to a tech spec.