For any consumer use to play back audio I can't image a scenario where TL071 wouldn't be enough. And you'd rarely even need an op-amp when integrated solutions are available.
There's a massive (old) list of them in Horowitz & Hill TAOE 3e Table 8.3a p. 522. I'm sure you can just go to Digikey or Octopart and do a parameter search for high-voltage, low-noise, BJT-input op-amps too. If one wanted to "use a Ferrari to go the grocery store", they could always use a $20 AD797 or LT1115 for audio applications. :o)
Fun fact: a rectangular sheet of resistor with a specific thickness and terminals at both sides has a resistance unit of: ohms per square. Not square meters, just square!
The problem with the common CO2 sensor modules is they don't have DC accuracy. Meaning they rely on the device being present in place where it regularly (e.g at least once a week) gets exposed to fresh air, which the module sets as its baseline. This works because fresh air has roughly the same CO2 concentration everywhere.
Hopefully this method doesn't have the same restriction.
Performance. JS would need to run 60 times a second without hiccups. But JS is single-threaded, therefore any time something clogs your main thread you'll skip a frame. Plus, as incredible as modern JS engines are they're still not as efficient as the native code, which leads to extra CPU usage and that spells trouble for battery life.
The way animations are done in react native for instance, is that you use JS to define the animation and send it to the native code which actually executes it.
JS should just do the same in the browser instead of relying on an arcane language not designed for this
JS animation libraries let you declaratively define and hook into CSS animations.
"Arcane language" not only is CSS one of the core languages of the web, but also if you find this arcane I wonder what you think of the "native" code that react native is generating for the animations.
CSS as an animation engine is completely acceptable, and it's limitations (like the one in TFA) are slowly being pushed back.
>"Arcane language"
>"native" code that react native is generating for the animations.
>CSS as an animation engine is completely acceptable, and it's limitation
>TFA
No way that pun is intended, but CSS is kinda a Tunable/Timed Finite Automaton; but being of a lower class of technically-capable expression than Javacscript, which is of a higher set of class of automata.
Just recently I had to code a little but complex animation and I ended up using the web animations API. It's nice, it was a lot less code than the css counterpart.
But, if I* have to write this same animation in two years and @property is widely available, I'll reach up for that first.
*To be honest, it will be 100% an LLM that writes it for me.
So since the original comment was questioning the necessity of animations in CSS, and JS is essentially using CSS animations for many things, I'd say the answer is yes. It's also a great way for UI designers to use subtle movement to hint at actions/status/next steps/etc without having to execute any JavaScript. When you've got a purely visual task, I'd say involving a general purpose programming tool is the unnecessary part— like using sed or the like vs opening up a repl in Python or whatever.
No - CSS and JavaScript are two ways of defining the same thing, an animation. Safari runs its accelerated animations with CoreAnimation - is CoreAnimation a CSS animation?
Whether a language is arcane or not depends on the levels of comfort one is familiar with the language, or how approximately familiar someone is with similar languages.
It was before valgrind. Besides, valgrind isn't always available, it requires all code paths to be tested, and it can be really slow making it impractical for some code.
Default initialization, on the other hand, gives 100% coverage. Experience with it in D is a satisfying success.
Didn't Samuel L. Jackson hold board members hostage at his school, and among the members was MLK Sr.? And he wasn't even part of a radical movement like Fred Hampton and the Black Panthers.
reply