Seriously, I don't need my car to get weekly OTA updates. And my 8yr old nissan qashqai had lane assist, it's hardly revolutionary. Tesla is pretty much dead in Europe, mainly due to Musks personality, but the quality of its product is also poor.
HK is dead, it's just China now. No independence and so no reason to be there than mainland China.
The banking and shipping and other service industries will slowly migrate to Singapore and KL, possibly Bangkok and HK will be a non-entity in a decade or two. I know many HK expats who moved to the UK who had seen it's decline in just the last 5 years.
I actually heard this from my wife who is working with GOSH and related a version of this to me. So I was really grateful to be able to read the proper analysis.
Then they'll have to build their own tech though instead of just fining foreign tech and regulating tech to death. Not really their thing. China's helped by being pro-China.
The US frequently buys us up whenever we get something going in tech.
Like DeepMind.
Now, a question: what exactly has been innovative about X specifically after Musk bought it and fired so many of the people working there?
Another question: what can X do that all the free clones can't do?
While I'm at it, what about vice versa? Because if the free clones can do more than X, that would show how un-innovative X has become.
What I've seen from X since the purchase has been copying other people's features. Longer messages, videos, that kind of thing. Even getting into GenAI, though on that at least everyone is plagarising everyone else.
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
That will be why the doc tells you it's too expensive, because over the counter is cheap. It's not that they can't afford it, but in the UK there is a standard prescription price. It's under £10 per prescription for any drug that prescribed, but it's a flat fee. So if they prescribe something that costs less than the prescription charge it makes no sense for the patient.
Let's say you program code for a hellfire heat tracking missile. Now sure you can tell yourself it's only going to be used by the good guys but really you know at some point your code is going to be responsible for someone innocent getting killed.
So there's probably that bit of people with morals and a conscience who have an issue with the 'defense' industry.
How exactly does your drone defend? Does it do it by being a good offense?
That may give you an idea of why you are getting judged.
How many degrees of separation need to exist before your culpability drops to nearly zero?
One degree? Two? Three?
Someone cashing a paycheck from Facebook or Google can tout how the company is connecting people, which is like military folks saying they work in defense.
I feel like almost no one working at a for-profit company can truly escape the principle of do no harm.
The fact that I lean into the positive aspects of my work is just natural. Everyone does the same thing, since every product has both good and bad aspects.
If you make bolts in a factory and some of those bolts are used for an aeroplane, some of which may be bombers it's probably negligible. If you, like the OP, are creating a drone with the specific effect of being a weapon, then I think I'm on safe ground saying there is no separation. You are actively making the world worse.
reply