Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more azatris's comments login

I guess one would be that for life to exist it needs to use energy.


2nd law of thermodynamics only applies on macroscopic scale. So not really inevitable.

Plus, the laws of physics are based on a set of axioms, which don't necessarily have to be true.


>Plus, the laws of physics are based on a set of axioms,

Well no. They're based on empirical observations.


Hi :-)

This is very interesting. What exactly are you doing then? Designing (software, hardware, both?) dumb devices for home?


Parent poster's bio link points to https://www.hellotwist.com/ which does multi-room speaker systems.

What I was going to say before thinking to check the link, is that there must be a wealth of applications available to the instrumentation engineer, using modern microcontrollers without making the full step to Internet of Things.

The smoke alarm with the "I'm cooking for the next ten minutes" button. The simple alarm clock that knows weekends from weekdays, or even your work shifts. The thermostat with a few dozen more available states than the traditional ones and a sane interface. Electric showers that deliver a pleasant showering experience. Smart dumb devices.


Twist seems like a pretty clever idea, especially by integrating it all into the lightbulb.

Can anyone think of potential downsides to this approach? Other than the audio probably not being of very good quality compared to a serious speaker system.


We've used a really high quality audio driver and have some future products that'll help round out the system (aka subwoofers).

For reference here is the data sheet of speaker we use: http://www.baysidenet.tv/catalog/pdf/Peerless/30n18al04-04.p...

We also have a half a dozen other products designed to fit into this form factor, all of which provide a superior lighting experience to what is available on the market today.


I'm sure it's good, but I don't think you'll win the audiophiles over.


Do you have any growth statistics as reference?


Are you the person who took my place? :) Got to the last stage, twice, in London.

To me, the Code Review Best Practices seem awfully like very general knowledge, just gathered together. Not sure if it's HN-worthy per se.

However, the John Carmack link is quite enlightening.


I sure hope not -- I'm working at the headquarters in San Jose this summer.


Same here. I've had two of these and they are just so enjoyable, not to mention the incredibly positive feedback.


World of Warcraft: When Alliance member said "lol", the Horde member saw it as "kek". Imitation of different languages.


> I'll trust my common sense

Good heuristic. I've started to only trust research results that have very high confidence in their results and which is peer-reviewed, e.g. nut consumption cause towards life span [1].

[1] http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1307352


It isn't as surprising once you realize tea (L-theanine & caffeine), coffee (caffeine) and cigarettes (nicotine) all are nootropics. :)

More information: http://www.gwern.net/Nootropics


Another data point: Same here, same story, but with a good display. :)


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: