New in CSS Selectors Level 4 is the ability to optionally pass a selector list into :nth-child() and :nth-last-child().
For example, :nth-child(2 of .highlight) selects the second matching element that has the .highlight class. Put differently: out of all children with the class .highlight, select the second one.
Agreed. Here is a video titled "How a simple Django application works" that is 8 minutes long. It has 29 likes and 27 dislikes. It's a pretty poor quality video, in my opinion.
So if there was a similar video with the same views and likes but 0 downvotes you think it'd be significantly better? I'd guess the difference was noise.
I mean "maybe," right? It just seems like a sample-size problem rather than indicating any bias one way or another. And of course, as far as these things go, you only find out the quality after you watch some or all of it.
Perhaps youtube is the wrong medium for a lot of things and dislikes may not be the best way to express that.
Youtube is borderline stupid right now for most channels that don't have organic growth... what they should do is re-open monetization and live streaming to everyone as its creating its own hell hole if you ask me with the 9 minutes of smash the like button and 1 minute of content we're seeing on every channel that isn't organically growing or making money through other means.
They've changed the sidebar algo/design in the past six months or so and I tell ya, I used to actually use it, but not anymore at all. It's basically been remodeled into the same "front page" business case as Soundcloud, Amazon, and any other "choose from a variety of things that may or may not be sponsored (but almost always are) and only ever relate to your watch history by chance."
I sometimes chime in on posts where OP makes a tool in the same domain as Run.
When I hit this article yesterday, the bash script convo hadn't started yet and I saw the OPs creation as not being in the same realm as Run, so didn't chime in.
But now that its been mentioned :)
Anyway I got a few extra subs from your call out, so thanks again for that!
(actually I just spent the last 30 mins reviewing 24 hours of HN posts to see where the call out might have come from, and finally found it :) -- Surprisingly google hasn't indexed this post yet so didn't show up in my saved search )
I think if that was ever said by a core member, it was stated as a goal, not a for sure thing. I believe I've only ever heard it as speculation / wishful thinking.
