Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more arscan's comments login

Thanks for the feedback! I'll definitely add that if I take the time to add more features.


Yes! I started with WebSockets, but Event Source met my needs and is much simpler.


I used browserify to bundle in Three.js and all the other dependencies. Yes, it's an embarrassingly large JS package. There are probably better ways of doing this, but being a weekend project I decided that it wasn't worth my time to investigate ;-)

If you look at the commits, I just tried to push a few lines of code every day (nights, weekends) over the course of a couple of months. It adds up.


I am quite stupid, I always thought that when people on HN talked about their weekend projects they meant something that they'd made in a single weekend. Only now upon reading your comment do I realize that it means something one is working on over any number of weekends. I've been on HN for about 7 years :/

All this time I've been wondering why it takes me weeks of weekends to complete what others do in a single weekend even though I regard myself as highly competent at both software engineering and programming. Then it turns out I had simply misunderstood the meaning of "weekend project".

Oh and also, very nice project, kudos.


I think it has dual meanings, I've always taken it that way. Don't feel stupid.


You’re not alone. Took two years (until now) for me.


All hand built, including the globe. I split that out into it's own library over at https://github.com/arscan/encom-globe

* edit: I did leverage quite a few great libraries, namely three.js... just none that are charting specific


beauty


Glad to see some people are getting a kick out of this. I built it a few years back while learning webgl, css3, node.js, redis, and modern (at the time) js tooling. Source over at https://github.com/arscan/encom-boardroom

I didn't build this with any real practical application in mind at the time. But some people have reused components in their own projects over the years, particularly the globe (https://github.com/arscan/encom-globe).


Not going to hesitate to toot your horn here, man. This is extremely well done! It's all great!

That globe as an interface itself is worth congratulations and should be an envy.

I'll have to look more into your work.


Oblivion next, please ;)

http://gmunk.com/OBLIVION-GFX


Thanks for pointing to this one. I haven't seen the movie but there's some good representations for dense volumes of data there. I'd like to build some network health representation around this.


Yeah I considered that one as well. I love all his work.


Putting the quality of your work aside(which is really amazing), I applaud the self discipline required to develop such a big project on free time alone. Hope to get there one day.


I liked the mobile orienteering detection. Looks great on Firefox/Android.


Thanks. I use it on a couple of my projects [1]. Happy to take PRs if anyone has ideas for improvement.

[1] https://github.com/arscan/pleaserotate.js


Very cool. I've been thinking of a way to capture this aesthetic on the web. I love what you've done, but I don't know if it works in a browser as well as I envisioned. Great code, I will reference the globe in future projects. Thanks


All awesome stuff! I'm currently working in the travel industry and immediately after seeing this I'm planning on using the globe for a flights dashboard. ;)


Great! If you end up using it let me know.


Do you have an estimate how long it took to build all that?


This was beautifully done! Impressive work! :)


I think this is in reaction to the confusion over Model 3 being the "next version" of the Model S. People might be holding off on buying the S because they think that the 3 is better.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/845278449811939328.

When asked why he named it Model 3 in that thread, his response was: "Because I was a dumb idiot and didn't realize at the time that it would cause confusion".

This mistake seems to have stuck with him -- he made a joke about it two months later when talking about naming his boring machines: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/860378029515718660


It is should have been Model E, like it was originally intended.

But I heard that some people didn't like the idea of S/E/X...


No, it was because Ford holds the trademark for Model E: http://insideevs.com/ford-motor-company-filed-for-model-e-tr...


Why not drop Model from the name? Porsche 911 vs Porsche Model 911. Tesla S vs Tesla Model S.


To me that looks more like a mistake from Porsche than an idea to replicate


I set it as no more a mistake than "Boeing 747" is over "Boeing Model 747" or "Mazda 626" or "Nissan GTR"

But "Tesla S" doesn't roll off the tongue as nicely.


Turns into 'tessless'


Ironically, the Porsche 911 was originally supposed to be the 901, but Citroen owned 901 so Porsche had to rename.


Someone needs to put together a history of vehicle naming conventions. Like things in the military, it's kind of fascinating how things wind up getting called what they do.


That, or they could try switching up the descriptor:

Tesla Type T

Tesla Version V

Tesla Mark III M

Tesla Ausf. A


So now we have S3X, which is much more 'elite' for the tech crowd ;)


Future Y crossover makes it "S3XY". I love a billionaire with a cheeky sense of humor.


Just wait for the Tesla Pickup... Model I ;)

I S3XY

Then the next version of the roadster... the Model M (play off BMW M series...ubiquitous already for performance)

IM S3XY


Model H

HI S3XY


Musk liked that joke but Ford has the "Model E" trademark


>>People might be holding off on buying the S because they think that the 3 is better.

But model 3 is $35k vs Model S @ $80k-$120k. These feel like two very, very different markets.


You're assuming everyone is smart enough to realize that


Is that the weight on Earth or Mars? Sites listing its specs are unclear on that.


It's the weight on Earth. Just look for a source that specifies in kg - there's no ambiguity about what the SI unit represents.


No, ambiguity was introduced when the measurement was switched from force to mass. The question remains: what is the weight/force experienced on the wheels on Mars? Knowing the mass won't tell us unless we also know the acceleration due to gravity on Mars.


Wikipedia says the dry mass is 899 kg, which is about the 2000 pounds of weight (on Earth) mentioned by GP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curiosity_(rover)


The pound is a unit of mass, same as the kg (it's defined as exactly 0.45359237kg). Just as 900kg is 900kg everywhere, 2000lb is 2000lb everywhere. The colloquial weight is literally a force, and its imperial unit is thus the pound-force.


This is incorrect. The pound is a unit of force, similar to a Newton. The pound-mass(notated lb-m) is similar to the kg. The conversation you gave above is based on Earth gravity for weight.


> This is incorrect. The pound is a unit of force, similar to a Newton. The pound-mass(notated lb-m) is similar to the kg.

That's the pound-force (lbf).

Pound and pound-mass are aliases. Indeed the official facts sheet defines the mass of the rover in kg and pounds.

> The conversation you gave above is based on Earth gravity for weight.

My comment is based on mass being an intrinsic property of matter, gravity does not enter the equation.


There are about a dozen different units that are all called "pounds," and you have to rely on context to know which is meant. When I took physics in high school, pounds were always force (abbreviated lbf) and we used slugs for mass ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_(mass) )


Which would make it about 338 kilos on Mars - wikipedia lists Mars' gravity as 0.376g (vs earth's 1)


Technically that would make it 899kg on Mars, the kilogram is a unit of mass. However the Rover would weigh ~8800N on Earth and ~3300N on Mars.


Yikes, crashed during registration, then after restarting it wouldn't let me upload a square profile picture (blocking progress on the crop screen), then once I took another picture it gave me a "Backend error" on the next screen, once again blocking progress. I give up. I hate to be negative, and I usually would cut a new app some slack, but the whole reason I am trying this is that I expected a high level of quality given the background of the founder.


Crashed 3 times on android before I could complete the registration.

UI needs work, if they add more countries they can not expect me the scroll down a list of 200+ items to find my phone country prefix. Just let me enter it.

For some reason on some pages the hamburger menu button is an actual hamburger while on other activities it is the standard 3 lines. I wonder if that is on purpose or a mistake.


Guess it managed to upload your phone ID and other stuff just fine in the process.

To the developers: Give me a website or leave me alone.


Yeah, I am always hesitant to give my phone number, but I had enough trust in this app since the founder had a solid background. I don't often give up that info. I regret that I did now...


Is he putting (or planning on putting) solar panels on cars as you mentioned? I think the "solar-roof-with-battery product" he was referring to was solar city + powerwall on a house.


Since this is for fun for you (in the short term at least), did the price tag of Cinema4D come into play when choosing it as your tool? I've been getting into 3D as well as a hobby, and given a choice I'd use Cinema4D because it is popular among professionals in the domain I'm interested in, but that $3k+ price tag is hard for me to justify.


You could start with Blender. It's very advanced and totally free.


Blender's pretty awesome. I've been using it since it was Not-a-Number shareware. I think that the "Free Blender" campaign was the first crowdfunding attempt that I ever experienced. It's been awesome watching the program continue to grow and flesh out with pro-level features over time!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: