Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | andywood's comments login

Imagine being so [insert your own term] that a robot is qualified to teach you to communicate better with humans.


Robot says you're coming across as judgemental ;-)


For me that moment is every time I read anything new about AI. Luddite life!



Come on.

I clicked on this link expecting to actually get some evidence.

You just wasted my time. Thank you not.


You got me.


Exactly. If your entire right hemisphere is permanently shut down from making computers the core of your identity, these are exactly the same thing.


I mean if you pay more attention to results than vibe, yeah they are. But you know, less coercive.


What do you mean by that sentence?


Right hemisphere refers to be brain. HTH to make sense of it now.


I am familiar with that part but the actual sentence is ambiguous to me. Oh well. You win some you lose some.


I think you mean that the only thing that's changed is that information that was tightly controlled by governments via a small but powerful set of mainstream media channels to advance the notion of an open society that played by a tight set of rules and respect for civil rights has been augmented by a small and even more powerful set of big mainstream internet companies.

Give yourselves a round of applause, Silicon Valley et al.


You think? Just read all the ones in black:

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Orwell

But as so many even here keep repeating so idiotically, "We live in a society. We live in a society. We live in a society..." Gotta keep trading that liberty for more safety. Gotta keep 'em safe.

Anyone see the new messages you get on Twitter when its AI pre-judges your tweet to be Intellectual Spam?

Good job Twitter employees, if you're reading. Keep up the great work. Keep us safe from code points arranged in wrong orders.


I’m pretty sure Twitter isn’t part of our government yet, but perhaps once Musk is crowned supreme emperor or whatever title he and Joe Rogan dream up in their next THC fueled brainstorm-podcast session, that will change.


If alarm bells didn't go off when free speech became a dirty word on the left I don't know what to tell you.


[flagged]


Personally, because I support victims of oppression, any words that disagree with me are hate speech.

Because everything I do is in service of victims of injustice, my actions are just.

There is no “cycle of violence”, only hidden power structures of oppression to be destroyed.


And who defines what constitutes as hate speech?

If I tell you to jump from a bridge to your death, is it my fault for telling you or your fault for acting upon it?

Punish actions, not words. The moment you punish peoples words, you remove the ability to debate, converse, express, rectify, understand.


The “fighting words doctrine” was established in the US in 1942.[0].

> [The Supreme Court] held that "insulting or 'fighting words', those that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace" are among the "well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech the prevention and punishment of [which] … have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem."

At least some things classified as hate speech, like racial slurs, seem to me to fall clearly under the category of fighting words. Is the fighting words doctrine fully unsound? Unsound only when applied to social media? Is hate speech just another name for it, or is it an expansion of it?

EDIT: My original link does not include the narrowing of the doctrine. [1] is a better source:

> the Supreme Court redefined the scope of the fighting words doctrine to mean words that are "a direct personal insult or an invitation to exchange fisticuffs."

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fighting_words


"Hate speech" is free speech. If I hate someone, then that's my God-given right to believe what I want and express my opinion, no matter how unwise that opinion is. If I commit or threaten violence, then I am breaking the law, and you can throw me in jail. But not a moment before


Actual leftists (e.g. Emma Goldman) don't say something as dumb as "free speech doesn't mean unlimited speech", but very few Americans are exposed to actual leftist thought on a regular basis. We mostly get pale imitations like "the squad".


Please define hate speech.

Generalizing everyone that disagrees with you as "those types" and then calling me pathetic to group me in with them is exactly the problem is was alluding to.


I'm not as fond of the redesign that took place sometime in the last decade or so, but I remember the old (circa 2000) Win32 docs as good examples of great documentation.

For the worst ever in all of human history, I submit the official Unreal Engine docs. They never finished them, and they ain't gonna. If it didn't come with full source I'd never get anything done because I'm not about to sit through 100 hours of YouTube videos to find the details I need.

A lot of software relies on user-created documentation these days. And it's not even a decent wiki anymore. It's more likely to be YouTube and a Discord. Damn kids.


Don't even get me started on Unreal's Python API docs.


IMO this is a normal way to feel about it. I'm american and while I'm not shedding tears, I do feel the significance. I'd have immense respect for her even if it were only for fulfilling one large role, honorably and consistently, for an entire human lifespan. How many politicians have? And I think she had a hard, hard job. Imagine having to live up to the expectations of a great Queen of England for that long without a meltdown or scandal.

It's quite a different context, however I felt sort of similar about John McCain, mostly for what he endured as a POW, and what he nevertheless went on to accomplish in politics.


Kiwi Farms has a thread on Taylor Lorenz from WaPo, because of certain erratic behavior. Taylor got her own dirt removed from the internet archive. Taylor has been helping Clara go after Kiwi Farms.

Taylor's uncle is Roger MacDonald, founder of TV News archive:

https://archive.org/details/roger-macdonald-tv-archive

https://dicktracyonline.substack.com/p/who-is-taylor-lorenz

And of course you've already begun downvoting.


Another fun fact:

Taylor's uncle is Roger Macdonald, apparently a fairly prominent operator within the internet archive:

https://archive.org/details/roger-macdonald-tv-archive

https://dicktracyonline.substack.com/p/who-is-taylor-lorenz


That makes more sense.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: