And this is where the fallacy of judgement lies, people do not make objective decisions and assume based on random factors.
Imo, only similar type of people get the attention which they can usually use better at another company making more but sucks for the senior. Hence, mentoring should be done selflessly based on who needs it most as it ends up increasing the average and hopefully some other senior somewhere trains your new hire.
You'd be surprised how much a pet can understand.It's more like we can't understand them.They know all our ticks and can sense emotions before even we realize.
You are out of touch, M1/M2 runs circles around any other silicon and the pro line has great design and usage for convenience built in.
The solid resale price is the proof as no windows device is worth anything used.
USA literally creates money out of thin air, there is no upper cap as they keep extending the ceiling.
This is how we have a CEO making $100b from a single company stock which would be impossible if it were a zero sum game.
Hype which is even more rarefied air, can create so much money without taking anything from the customers. Silicon Valley VC's create valuations for companies out of thin air and then triple it even without anyone ever seeing that money.
Attention which is unlimited in a way is a new form currency, which is why you see platforms being built up to get more eyeballs.
The rule you mentioned comes into play when taking into account players in the game i.e any game where you can add more players is guaranteed to become zero sum.
Imo, only similar type of people get the attention which they can usually use better at another company making more but sucks for the senior. Hence, mentoring should be done selflessly based on who needs it most as it ends up increasing the average and hopefully some other senior somewhere trains your new hire.