Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Zitrax's comments login

I guess properly is important there, in reality certain initial orderings are more common and we use certain techniques for shuffling with our hands making it less random than "properly".


I assume you refer to https://github.com/torbiak/git-autofixup. I have also used it, and its ok but not perfect.


I use git autofixup; it was much better than git absorb last time I checked

> it doesn’t say anything when there was no match

that's what it should do

> it can be quite slow as things grown

How? All the slowness (on large repos) I've seen has been fixed.


> that's what it should do

No it is not.

> How?

I don’t know, that’s just an observation from using it, semi regularly I autofixup changes and it takes a while to do anything.


you're probably using an old version


You can see in the repository that it was benchmarked against oneTBB.


That was my first thought as well, "The camera will be used to take photographs" seem pointless, if it's a camera app it's obvious if it's not it does not help the reviewer.


I don't think you can date the axe-heads from the material? I assume they date based on objects found nearby and the technique used to make them. Which is also why knowing the exact location is important.


Recent is relative, the latest comment is from April 2024, not something that popped up today.


Some comparison between fractal compression and jpeg here: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.5555/364682.364685


Seem to be different studies and measurements - so both.


I didn't see any links to the second study.


134 MB to be exact.


From the abstract: "The resulting Δ14C record exhibits an abrupt spike occurring in a single year at 14 300–14 299 cal yr BP and a century-long event between 14 and 13.9 cal kyr BP."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: