Discrediting the article with blanket statements and criticizing the format of the site are both against HN guidelines which you can review at the bottom of this page.
nonsense. This is relevant to the authors thesis: If frameworks are bad and everything should be done manually or in a decoupled way - the quality of the work product of the author, should be subject to discussion. Are they hand weaving beautiful prose? or deluding themselves that they can do a better job?
I find it highlights a key discrepancy: if the author had relied on a framework for this, the quality could be far greater at less effort.
