Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ZachS's comments login

It could be an Ent situation, they live too long to interact with something that only lives 100 years.


Thanks. Forgot this version. There's also a "slightly" different version of "we exist in a different timeframe / timespeed / dimension."

Star Trek TNG "Time's Array Part 1/2" had the alternative overlaid dimension variation.

TNG "Timescape" had the alternate timeframe / timespeed with the Warbird / Enterprise existing in a different time than the runabout, as well as fruit that rapid aged / decomposed relative to the crew members (and the fun issue of accidentally walking into a bubble of AGE+50yrs).


What sort of vulnerabilities are you worried about? You're running trusted code, connecting to a trusted service via https. Not browsing arbitrary websites. I doubt many vulnerabilities would affect this.


> trusted service via https

you think that would stop a zero day vulnerability? if you have browser that won't be updated for a long time and its connected to the internet, it is a huge attack surface.

Unless you were running local static file without ever talking to the internet.


gaming reviews to extract money is insulting



The biggest dangers are going to be non-paying clients, and leads drying up. If you can't find any leads, you'll end up spending all your "self time" eaten up with business development.


Thank you for clarifying something I've been struggling with for years. I have a couple hundred project ideas and inventions written down but always have this sense that I can't work on them because they are seemingly not the best use of my time. Instead, I spend nearly the entirety of my time either immersed in the logistics of wrapping up a contract, or working to find another.

If someone could solve the business development end of freelancing, that would be more valuable to me than matchmaking. The work was never the problem for me, but the angst surrounding it.


Tools like https://freelanceinbox.com/ and 10xmanagement.com are trying to solve the leadgen problem for developers. Haven't used them, but might be worth a look.


I will see. As of now I have more leads than I can manage, but I am aware of the risk (also for this reason I rather do it part time than full switches of paid work vs side projects).


This is essentially what I've been doing for about a year and a half.

I've found that the best way to do it is to focus 100% on client projects for a month or two, and then take a month or two for yourself. IMHO "single-tasking" results in much better quality work.

While you're working on your own thing, you should be meeting with potential clients and setting up your next paying gig, since the sales cycle on a couple month project large enough is about a few weeks to a month anyways.


This sounds completely awesome! How do you get people to hire you for just a month or two though? I assume it's not as simple as the typical job search


I talk to a lot of people and try to find those who need a specific project done. I try not to take on "open ended" jobs.


I'm not convinced the added safety is worth it.

If you had the choice between getting to your destination in 20 minutes, with a 11.4 in 100,000 chance of dying, or arriving in 25 minutes with a 3 in 100,000 chance, which would you choose?


Assuming you had 40 years remaining in your life, and no one else was in the car with you, and the cost of fire/rescue services is ignored, and the chance of serious long-term injury instead of death is also ignored, then:

Option #1 takes 40 * 365.25 * 24 * 11.4/100000 = 40 hours off your life.

Option #2 takes 40 * 365.25 * 24 * 3 /100000 = 10.5 hours off your life.

Statistically speaking then, option #1 takes off about 30 hours of your life compared to option #2.

In fact, with those numbers you shouldn't take option #1 unless you only expected to live for another 1-2 months.

On the other hand, logging workers have a highest occupational rate of death, at 127.8 per 100,000 full-time workers per year. Assuming 2000 hours per year gives a much fatality rate per hour than what you've posited, so I don't understand your point.


You do realize that a large chunk of road deaths are pedestrians, people that explicitly did not choose to use a car and insted walk to their destination, and that are overwhelmingly killed by people that did choose a car?

I sure hope you do not drive if that is your attitude to safety.


This description of the problem is very susceptible to framing. i.e. how you ask this question will determine the response you receive.

A couple of reframes for example:

Would you rather drive a road where you gain 5 minutes and increase your chance of death by 4?

Would you rather drive a road where you lose 25% of your travel time to obstacles and change your chance of dying from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 30,000?

I believe the US government does have guidelines for how much a human life is 'worth' (~10M I had thought...) [0]. It's one of the 'objective' calculations taken into account when analyzing these types of projects.

[0] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_of_life


Would you say that again while considering your spouse is a travelling salesman? It's not about one-time trips, it's about the aggregated death toll over years or decades.


Yes, absolutely.

My comment was actually incorrect, since it's 11.4 in 100,000 per year. I think I'd want my spouse to spend 1/5th less time driving for the increase in risk.


5 minutes is that valuable to you?


25 minutes. Actually, no, I would just take the bus and arrive in 30 minutes, but having had spent the time doing something enjoyable rather than driving. :)


The article mentions safety for other road participants.

One issue is that going fast often doesn't kill the driver due to modern car safety, but some unsuspecting other road user.

In other words the drivers aren't carrying the risk so they are not the right people to ask whether this is a good trade-off.


Someone can check the math, but in my head I got about ten year crossover to about one sig fig (unless I really messed up it'll be between 2 and 20 years), so it would be far more economical in terms of wasted lifetimes with those made up stats to take the slower route.


Good. that's probably an indication that what most people really want is to get from point A to point B as quickly and cheaply as possible.


The browser is constantly repainting the polygon background at the top of the page, even when you've scrolled past it.


Wait. What? I'm gonna need some deets here. Please provide more context to the story of your paying strangers to call up your girlfriend every day.

-What did you have them say? -Did she find your delegation of affection to a paid third party extremely bizarre and off-putting? -What was her reaction to only receiving encouraging calls from strangers twice a week rather than every day?


Awesomeness Reminders was a service introduced at $10/month that would call you (or someone else) once a day to say "You're Awesome" -- as a way to cheer you up.

I opted to have this call go to my girlfriend. Didn't tell her anything. She's a very girly girl, and loves when anyone says "Your shoes look pretty etc". She thought it was quirky, funny, but then liked getting the awesome calls.

After a while, the daily calls became biweekly calls. Then I got this email: http://i.imgur.com/iqGmE.png


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: