Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Tempest1981's comments login

Who is the current occupant of the site? A quick search says Yahoo! and Coinbase. And maybe previously WeWork, temporarily leasing from Meta?

The historical former building stood unchanged until 5-10 years ago. There was a historical plaque on that building. It has been demolished and replaced by a nameless large 5-story office building.

The new building has an elaborate plaque facing the sidewalk. It includes a railroad diagram of the many corporate spinoffs from Shockley Semi.

And what started as a tech connection, became a deeper human connection.

> Like say, a major Microsoft investment in Intel.

> help Microsoft diversify away from NVIDIA (and eventually perhaps Qualcomm)

Would that be for datacenters? Or end user machines? Or handsets, ala Nokia?


>> People bitch about checked exceptions

> they predate Java, having made an appearance in CLU, Modula-3 and C++

Checked exceptions in C++? Can you force/require the call chain to catch an exception in C++? At compile time?


That was part of the idea behind them yes, as many things in WG21 design process, reality worked out differently, and they are no longer part of ISO C++ since C++17.

Although some want to reuse the syntax for value type exceptions, if that proposal ever moves forward, which seems unlikely.


At weddings, table sizes seem to be 8 or 10. Is that deliberate, to create 2 conversation groups?

I sometimes find myself trying to follow both conversations, or switching to the more interesting one. Is that bad etiquette?


I suspect that it's more about the geometry of best fitting people into the space. It allows the right amount of room for centerpieces and bread bowls and such. At least as far as the caterer and wedding planner are concerned, conversation is the last thing on their minds.

Those tables are intended for eight comfortably. They stretch to ten. You can do twelve, but everyone is gonna be cramped.


It's a size and shape that's so omnipresent one expects that it's some combination of geometrical efficiency, ability to pass/reach things, some flexibility in self-organizing conversational groups, and probably some other things such as not being too large to setup, teardown, and store.

Could be - making sure that everyone at the table always has a choice of conversation to listen to, instead of being trapped in one they have no interest in.

I doubt it's that explicit, though. Maybe it's just worked out better that way over the years, without anyone fully realizing the why?


I read somewhere that being the only kid without smartphone access is worse (for mental health) than giving your kid a smartphone.

I.e. there needs to be consensus among parents.


I suppose that is because of social exclusion. If all the important things are coordinates online and in real-time, then those kids can't participate. Communicating with your peers is much harder when the peer's baseline is "I'll just write a chat message" and it would take considerably more effort to talk to the kid who doesn't have mobile internet access.

Perhaps what relate the study kids was their school, which is probably already existing I guess ?

> I read somewhere that being the only kid without smartphone access is worse (for mental health) than giving your kid a smartphone.

What is definition of worse in context of mental health? Can free and open-source devices help or proprietary software is inevitable?


One area I recently learned about is the Kentucky Bend, which is encircled by the states of Tennessee and Missouri, so not connected to the rest of Kentucky. Before 1848, Tennessee tried to claim it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_Bend


Cell phones are little dopamine bags that we give our kids to carry around, and squeeze whenever they need a "hit". (Paraphrased from Scott Galloway)

Here's a similar version to the German link, but US store and voltage:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C99834TW

Any suggestions for something similar, but with temperature controlled speed?


Any chance it's the music he plays on his turntable, during the last 1 minute of the video?

Shazam says it's Khruangbin - People Everywhere (Still Alive)


Not unless the owner of that track is also the creator of this amplifier.


I thought he said it was unknown who filed the copyright claim, since Google doesn't provide that info.


Google (well, YouTube) does provide that info.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-RJbpFSFziI

    Video Unavailable
    This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Tom Evans


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: