from an outsider's perspective, this has been some of the most fun hacker news comment chains ive seen for a good long while keep it up, if you can consistently come up with such entertainingly divisive stuff as this you'll go far, i'm sure.
Both of these simply use the word england, they are not incorrect. Yes, some people are from a place called england, just like some people are from texas, and may write poetry or wax lyrical about how they like being from texas and what it means to them
Oh there were a good number of romans who had been to india and sri lanka, there were even a good number of roman traders from egypt who sailed as far as malaysia which they called the Golden Chersonese. They didnt really know about china but had some vague ideas that a large empire existed in the east names sinae but iirc they did send a diplomatic mission to it which ended up in vietnam being robbed if I remember right before ending up before the han dynasty with very little tribute and generally being a bit of a dissapointment. There were several other merchants and diplomatic missions over the years but in general it was of minor importance to both empires, far outside their spheres.
I'm usually annoyed as fuck by the idiotic cries of "Wikipedia isn't a source, ha ha ha!" all over the Internet; on the contrary, WP is usually not only an adequate but actually a pretty good first source for ordinary online discussions (and then if you really want to get into details, continue from WP's footnotes).
But in this particular case, with these particular WP articles... Yeah yeah, you were probably kidding. But there are also more serious articles on the subject. Like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Roman_relations .
the problem with that, as mentioned in the article, is that that breaks if the content of the page changes. So on stack overflow for example, what happens if someone changes the title of their question? you either break the url or use an old version of the title, thus being misleading.
Those advantages don't appear on metrics and therefore don't exist. If the benefit to the business is in two years and isn't measurable, the benefit it would bring will be misattributed to whoever happens to be around afterwards using it
That depends on context though. Sure, in a company driving for profits those metrics almost certainly won't exist. If the project is focused on end user experience, though, they would.
Accessibility is one area I've seen an overlap. It is still rare, but I have been on a couple teams where accessibility was a metric and it largely lead to better DOM structure and semantic HTML.
Quite true, unfortunately. But I think there are benefits that can be "feeled" almost instantly. I think problem is one of focus.
Lots of team leads don't focus on these solutions and their benefits but rather on the most recent technologies and their own benefits while ignoring (or accepting as inevitable) their costs. The longer you look in that direction, the harder it gets to see what you are missing or could get by looking elsewhere.
waaaaaaaay too late to be in any way effective. Not to mention vpns. It's going to be so ineffective I assume this move is designed to be read by american politicians rather than anyone else
reply