I've always been partial to this visual: https://analyticsindiamag.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/sim...

Hi also from Germany - works fine here

Ah metrics, always a great thing to optimise for.

The article does mention that there was a "high degree of agreement with the expert physicians in their grading", but it's nevertheless sad how much the report focuses on time spent on the task, and not on the correctness of the results, especially when it concerns a medical diagnosis. Very much inline with my expectations for a report on "AI for X".

Yes: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/07/rising-sea-levels-glo...

Use `git log --first-parent` and if you merge, write useful merge commit messages. There, I've resolved the difference between merge and rebase forever.

No one is surprised. People are saying that this _could_ be an Android app, and _should_ be an Android app -- and now it's been shown that it _already is_ an Android app.

You should have read a few more lines of that source - it also sends an "active" message to the tab, which is what adds and removes the copy/cut/paste event handlers.

13th-century Chinese rockets weren't landing on the moon either so both are simplifications.

13 century Chinese rockets were useful weapons or war though.

I've always preferred this alternative rewrite: https://imgs.xkcd.com/blag/spirit_rewrite_unknown_author.png

Thank you, that's much more aligned with the spirit of a rover that I imagine

That's a different bug (CVE-2024-0517 vs CVE-2024-0519)

I’m pretty sure the chain is all three bugs. 517, 518, 519.

I'm pretty sure it isn't, the write up only uses 517 to get an arbitrary write primitive and then did a pretty standard chain into a sandbox escape via wasm (disclaimer - I work on V8).

Hmm. I also thought the type confusion in 518 was the same one from the blog post, but looking at the patch, it's not either. I think I stand corrected overall.