Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Hrundi's comments login

A properly worded slack message is indistinguishable from an email, and can pretty much be treated as such


> The "AI" service consumes real resources

My disk space is a real resource as well


I don't remember any companies that ended thanks to cloudbleed, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong


This links to the product's application, the main website clears things up: https://codecrafters.io/


6.22's source code was readily shared by some russians back in 2002 or so, and it was the real deal


I thinks its a 6.00 beta


It can, until the extension developer receives a tempting offer for it, as has happened countless times


Fork the extension and use your own then.


And you’re going to spend the time reviewing every single commit to make sure the dev didn’t sell out without telling anyone? Or risk running a potentially outdated and vulnerable extension?


And then you’ve gotta wake up in the morning and put your shoes on!

What’s with the argumentative tone? Do you think that the replier doesn’t know this?


The obvious point being that the “fork your own code and write your own kernel” attitude is simply unworkable for 99.999% of the population.

If we had to waste that much time re-inventing the loaf of bread, and then making sure that my neighbors didn’t decide to throw some raisins in my loaf, that we never get around to figuring out the next best thing: slicing it.


The argument you're making (you can't trust software whose you code you haven't studied) applies to every software package ever made.


Exactly. So we have to choose: trust everything reasonably mainstream with the hope that someone is watching it, or stop functioning.


...which is a lot more work than "one Chrome extension away".


Many people enjoy working with it, it's perfectly fine for almost everything and it's fast enough? I mean, why not?

Other apps bundle entire runtimes for other languages, I don't see how PHP would be any different


Analysis paralysis is very cruel. Many of my side projects died because of this, or just got stuck in development hell, even while interest was high.

Looking back, some would have made good money if I had just released them


Google Voice is US & Canada only, I believe.


Unfortunately Relay phone number masking is too, at this point in time.


The fact that this has been going on for several years makes me believe Google either doesn't care or the problem is particularly hard to fix (less believable)


It has been an ongoing battle for 10-15 years at this point. Search engines are constantly battling people trying to game their systems. I have to wonder if Google hasn't lost the thread a bit, inside their surely quite complex algorithm black boxes.

For a while now Google has suggested that the best way to rank well is to have human readable content and focus on user experience. At the same time, natural language generation has come leaps and bounds, to the point where sometimes even I, a human, can't tell if an article has been spun by a bot or not.

So if Google starts ranking human readable content, and robots can now produce human readable content, what is the next ranking signal they can use to differentiate spam from humans? Are we going to end up with "Verified Websites" ala verified Twitter handles?

A huge portion of the web at this point is just bots communicating with eachother, and legitimate business systems having to process bots participation on the internet. I imagine the portion of the web that Google crawls that is legitimate versus that which is bot generated would surely be majority bots, just because of how fast they can generate content. One thing they can't do as easily though is register domains, so it may be one of the better points of defense.


The dead internet theory.


Google has at the very least neglected its search for many years now and recently has also actively made it worse through all the censorship and thought control stuff. I find it rather surprising because essentially all of google’s success is lynchpinned by search. All it would take is for a narrative to dominate that the best results can be found elsewhere, which does not seem particularly remote, considering how much damage google has done to its search.


I noticed issues since Matt Cutts left. No one care anymore. There are AI generated website that have been running for years, ranking highly in Google.


It's incredibly easy to fix. They don't care as they have a monopoly.


Another comment links to a blacklist, which works.

If it can be effectively blacklisted, then Google is dropping the ball. This isn’t difficult algorithm foo failure.

I don’t agree with your sentences, but I do agree with your point.


Allow people to report AI generated website to a human at Google.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: