For the sake of this issue here, does it matter which is used i wonder, because I have been unable to find any source willing to spell it out. (that is, is simply turning it off on the adapter enough)

Yup, I've been waiting to see someone point this detail out in response to the rosy adoption numbers.

This

Jokes on them, i've had IPv6 disabled at the adapter level for years.

It's even worse than that. Even if these did work, the goal isn't just to make it harder.. These will act as a chilling effect on viewing, the first time there is a security risk, or it become convenient, the information will be out there. Or at least the risk and fear of such.

Number 02 is one of the major one i was thinking of. This shit is evil. I don't see them surviving long if they ever attempted to push this crap.

Eventually everyone will adopt this and there will be no escape from ads outside of jailbreaking your device and flashing oss software.

And even deeper on my blacklist your company goes!

Who did they think this was a good idea? They are doomed.. Who is going to buy this crap?

Onto the blacklist you go.. I mean if it wasn't on it already to begin with because of the mere idea of hardware based ads.

I'm not sure how they plan on surviving as a hardware maker. Who is going to buy this crap?

Same.