So it differs from Reddit as Reddit's feed is based made of subreddits that share links creating a unique feed of content while WebArcs's feed is feed of the other feeds of sites you subscribe to.
It differs from an RSS reader in the way we show the content. Most readers such as feedly try to restrict the functionality of the product so people will pay for it and only offer you an easier way to view the sites you already like and so already have a way of accessing.
On WebArcs we try to enable discovery of new feeds you would not view otherwise. This is the hardest thing to get across, I only keep up with hacker news, Reddit, TheMacro, recode and a lot more because I have WebArcs.
It's when you find a new site you wouldn't of kept up with before on WebArcs that you start getting the real value.
tl;dr It's about enableing you to discover new sites you couldn't keep up with otherwise.
Hey I'm actually working on a web app to allow people to keep up with a ton of RSS feeds remotely.
I was thinking since it seems like something you could be interested in it would be great if you check it out and possibly give me some feedback.
I'm the founder of WebArcs (http://webarcs.com) an RSS aggregate for discovering and subscribing to websites. I'm just starting out and I want to see this be the way people surf the web in the future.
I was wondering which demographics I ought to target too too help build a strong user base?
Thinking of demographics is kind of a big company way of looking at things; you're not ready for that.
For now you should focus on finding any users that want to use it. The way to do that is to try to distill the value proposition. Why would people use WebArcs instead of going to an aggregator (Reddit, HN), another news reader (Pulse, flipboard), or content sites directly?
Then, show it some people and get some feedback. See if you can get people to use it as their default way to surf the web. If you can get even one person to do that (other than yourself), you've made some progress.
It differs from an RSS reader in the way we show the content. Most readers such as feedly try to restrict the functionality of the product so people will pay for it and only offer you an easier way to view the sites you already like and so already have a way of accessing.
On WebArcs we try to enable discovery of new feeds you would not view otherwise. This is the hardest thing to get across, I only keep up with hacker news, Reddit, TheMacro, recode and a lot more because I have WebArcs.
It's when you find a new site you wouldn't of kept up with before on WebArcs that you start getting the real value.
tl;dr It's about enableing you to discover new sites you couldn't keep up with otherwise.
Thanks for your question by the way =D