Your comment suggests that you at least read the last section. : )
But still, that's headings and structure working as intended: You skimmed it, got a good sense of what it's about, and decided it wasn't for you.
I'm assuming that if I had presented the same information in a different way, it still probably wouldn't have appealed to you if you could tell from the headings that you weren't interested.
> edit: I think I read HN comments more than HN articles. Interesting
Nothing wrong with that, in my opinion.
I always check comments first before clicking the link, unless it's something I'm knowledgeable about and/or interested in and already know I want to read. It saves a lot of time.
One could argue that using copyrighted content in LLMs, much like reposting, should fall under fair use. This is also Microsoft's claim in the GitHub Copilot lawsuits. It's up to the court to decide though. (IANAL)
I like chrome, I don't like google. I mean: I am so used to chrome devtools, I don't even know how to switch to firefox. I gave it a try and it was frustrating that I didn't know where to find my shit. Felt like 10x performance loss for my web development activities. Is there any way to make firefox devtools look and feel like chromes?
I doubt that customizing your dev tools would be worth the effort.
You’ll get accustomed to where things are as you go. After a few days or weeks, chances are you’re not going to even think about it again, or miss the old dev tools.
Surely there's more similarities than differences. We inspect HTML, we mess with CSS, we debug javascript, we look at headers, responses, warnings and errors. All that stuff is the same in both browsers. So what exactly about your shit is different?
And I'm really feeling all this right now, helping someone with something that is now completely different than how it was three months ago, and does not match any documentation that shows up in search results, though I'm sure there's a link to the actuall correct KB article that is only mentioned once in a forum post. At least I get to bill for this work.
As one of the founders of everfind.ai, I'm thrilled to see the community engaging with our mission to simplify document search and retrieval. I'm curious—what's the biggest challenge you face when managing your documents, and which integrations or features would transform your workflow?
Combining universal time-series prediction models with latent space global knowledge on realtime information could result in an accurate model prediction on the stockmarket with a bias towards succeeding. https://research.google/blog/a-decoder-only-foundation-model...
Great initiative! It's always inspiring to see individuals open-sourcing their projects to benefit the community.
At refind.ai (https://refind.ai/), we’ve been working on a similar challenge of navigating large volumes of documents, but with a more AI-driven and user centric approach. Beyond just search, we focus on transforming unstructured data into structured insights. This includes features like automatic metadata extraction, natural language search, and integrations with external systems like email and CRMs.
To those who struggle with file management at scale, especially in environments where tools like Spotlight or Windows Search fall short, I think there’s a lot of potential for tools like Buzee to evolve further. If anyone wants to collaborate or learn more about our approach, feel free to reach out!
Best of luck with Buzee’s journey—I’d love to see how the community builds on it!
Just bear in mind while they are yelling "shut it down" there will be a bunch of commenters with no idea whats happening saying that they are just over reacting
edit: I think I read HN comments more than HN articles. Interesting