Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hughrr's commentslogin

Also you can run x86-64 and arm64 VMs side by side with UTM on the M1’s. That’s what I am doing. Although I don’t need to use the x86-64 one these days as Debian/arm64 is fine for my needs.


Just a heads up with this. If you want one, make sure you get an off the shelf config if you can. The turnaround times for replacements and repair is likely to be bad on non stock configurations.

This pushed me to the 14” MBP with 16GB and 1TB. You can literally get it swapped out same day at apple stores if anything goes wonky.


Great hobby. Combines many disciplines from carpentry, electronics, engineering and even civil engineering to some degree.


If this was Spotify vs Google I’d take Spotify.

If this was anything vs Apple I’d take Apple.

That’s the ranking of trust I have as far as customer support goes. It’ll be a crap fest when match.com or some other atomic level shyster markets their way into sounding more reputable than they are.


I dislike Apple, and right now I wouldn't consider buying an Apple product again (I had an iPhone 1 ahead of most people in the UK). I spent the first ~5 years of my career developing on Android and I still use Android.

I agree with your payment hierarchy 100%.


This. I had kids in my early 20s. It’s great because I still have a connection with them even though two are adults.

Kids from much older parents (40+) are also almost completely weird.


> Kids from much older parents (40+) are also almost completely weird.

My experience is that kids from older parents are wise beyond their years, and tend to be far more well-adjusted adults.


> Kids from much older parents (40+) are also almost completely weird.

They are, in every quantitative and qualitative measure, far more well-adjusted than the poor children, like yours, who had no choice but to grow up with literal children as parents.

(Or maybe we shouldn’t generalize like this…?)


No please do. You’re on the mark there. I was waiting for someone to make this point.

The weirdness comes from the social disparity and disconnectedness from peers their own age due to different social attitudes from parents.

The generalisation comes from the observation that older parents tend to lead to less progressive attitudes.


Well, you’re clearly way of the mark here, since you completely missed my point.

The weirdness is in your head, mate. (Although the generalization is your responsibility.)

I mean, people like you, i.e. people who become parents at a relatively young age, literally have their brain chemistry altered to protect their offspring, WAY before you have actually experienced life as an adult.

I could make grand speculative declarations about your children based on this, but I actually realize it’s meaningless, so I won’t.


> people like you, i.e. people who become parents at a relatively young age, literally have their brain chemistry altered to protect their offspring, WAY before you have actually experienced life as an adult.

Do you have any links or terms to Google to support this? On one hand it sounds reasonable. But on the other hand for the entirety of human history up until the last several decades what you think of as "relatively young" would have been completely normal or even unusally old. So it wouldn't make sense evolutionarily for that to be disadvantageous.

Disclaimer: had kids young and I think people that want kids and are emotionally mature enough to handle the challenge with a similarly minded partner should not wait and do it young. What is a definition of "ready for kids" that wouldn't cause 99% of people in the world to never have the opportunity to have kids.


Jfc, please read the thread.


Are these assumptions based on your personal experience? I ask because mine has been completely different than what you describe.


Thank you, this was my point in the post they responded to.


I think there could be a couple of confounding factors here:

1) What demographics are these older parents in? Are they basically baby boomers or Gen X having kids late? Milennials are approaching 40 years old, so they could potentially be more chill as first time parents perhaps or not.

2) If both parents are old, then I could see the mother potentially feeling overprotective, feeling like all her eggs are in one basket so to speak. I'd kind of think that an older father would probably be more chill.

In 2006 I worked with a software developer that was 50 years old and was equally new to Ruby on Rails and also had his first baby on the way. He was chill and young at heart.


> Kids from much older parents (40+) are also almost completely weird.

By what measure? I was 42 and my wife was 40 when we had our daughter who is now 13 and headed off to full time pre conservatory program in violin next year. Well adjusted, sensitive and empathic, I can’t think of any way in which she’s ‘weird’ Certainly not by any conventional definitions of the word.


> Well adjusted, sensitive and empathic

I'd say that's an unfortunately rare outcome.

Perhaps even a "weird" one.


> Kids from much older parents (40+) are also almost completely weird.

Yeah, I love you too.


Having screwed this up in my 30s and spent the first half of my 40s doing a desperate low budget TV montage, I agree with this entirely. Some things you can't undo and I regret that. Learn from my mistake :)


I'm buying a cake tomorrow to celebrate.

I think Orson Scott Card, despite being a complete loon, raised an interesting concept in the book Speaker For The Dead. Obituaries should be spoken honestly to all. Not speaking ill of the dead is morally wrong.


I'll take moral guidance from... checks notes... anyone other than Orson Scott Card, thank you.


Yeah felt a little dirty writing that.


It's an interesting idea, but it has a few drawbacks.

You can't defend yourself when you're dead. You can't be your own witness. Nor can you face your own accuser. Also, who would you trust to speak that truth for you?

Also, grieving family members are not the most rational people. Doing this could trigger violence in practice.

And obituaries have a legal function. As a modern society, we want to encourage the publication of obituaries as soon as someone passes away. It mitigates the risk of potential fraud.


> Not speaking ill of the dead is morally wrong.

Maybe just me but I feel like this misses what Speaker For the Dead does. It isn't about speaking ill or not ill of people but understanding their life experience, to give context to who they were as a person. This moves past the superficial reading of a person that just listing their actions and classifying them as good or bad.


Indeed it’s about honesty in the face of death. The speaker speaks both of the good and the bad things.

Obituaries tend not to.


I know. I still bought one.


I usually find something that I use that already exists that pisses me off and make my own version that doesn't piss me off.

I've done this with a couple of things which have worked out usable over time and are part of my daily workflow. Most recent is a simplified browser-based replacement for GnuCash which is based on Sqlite and Go. I will publish it on github when I am happy with it.


No. Intel worked out it needs to open its production capacity to other vendors. They will end up another ARM fab with a legacy x86-64 business strapped on the side. That's probably not a bad place to be really. I think x86-64 will fizzle out in about a decade.


I don't feel like ARM has serious technical advantages over x86-64 as an ISA, although it is cleaner and has more security features which is good. Isn't the main advantage just that it's easier to license ARM?

Once enough patents expire all ISAs are eventually equal, I'd think.


I feel much the same way. I've used both pretty extensively at this point, and I'm not sure if I'm a believer in either mentality. I'm hoping that RISC-V will be the one to blow my mind, though.


Spend some time looking at optimised compiler output on godbolt on both architectures. ARM has some really nice tricks up its sleeves.

I’ve been using ARM since about 1992 though so I may be biased.


So does Intel ;)


Yes and no. Look at some of the loop optimisations possible on ARM compared to x86-64. I've had x86-64 run 8 instructions that ARM does in 1 instruction.


I remember PPC and its rlwinms and co. My ARM isn’t that good, though I can read it.

But some of those x86 instructions take 0.5 cycles and some of them take 0 if they’re removed by fusion or register renaming. It has worse problems, like loop instructions you can’t actually use but take up the shortest codes.


This applies equally well, or dare I saw even better, on x86. (Arm tends to catch up because of higher IPC.)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: