Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The dev removed it to remove confusion, not to capitulate to a troll.



You see it wrong. They removed it because they fear being cancelled by headlines saying 'Godot maintainer refused to remove problematic documentation piece'.


You actually believed it would have caused the slightest bit of backlash? Twitter =/= public opinion.


News outlets look for sensational news, it is enough for them. Not long before, NYT ruined some hard-earned reputation of jetbrains with their clickbait headline and suffered no repurcursions.


I mean...

> 'Despicable Me' Actor Fired for Making 'OK' Symbol While Posing With 6-Year-Old Girl at Universal Orlando Resort

https://www.newsweek.com/actor-fired-ok-symbol-universal-res...


The week after the Christchurch shooting? I can see how it's probably a sensitive issue right then.

But like I said, twitter =/= public opinion, just like terrified PR team =/= public opinion. I bet 90% of people wouldn't be offended by that symbol given zero context.


Before Christchurch:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/us-coast-guard-member-removed-aft...

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/cubs-indefinitely-ban-fan...

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/07/17/mayor-suspends-4-co...

There were a few more stories, but can't find them at the moment. I remember that there was even a huge controversy on Twitter that someone from the British royal family did the OK sign. I think that was royal family, but not 100% sure, can't find any article about it at the moment

And you don't need public opinion to cancel someone. A dozen people complaining is often enough.


What happened to "Do not feed the trolls!" ? I had no idea about what you were talking about so i searched it. The new conotation of the OK finger symbol was invented and spread by 4chan. The den of internet trolls.

Have we (actually, you, because this -- meaning the redefining of OK -- is a US thing, maybe an American thing and I am far away from your continent) sunk so low as a society that we are now expected to be up to date with online trolling operations so that we can selfcensor to avoid being fired?


> we are now expected to be up to date with online trolling operations so that we can selfcensor to avoid being fired?

It appears that you have to basically follow the online outrage crowd to be up to date with what's considered offensive this week. It's not just online trolling. For example, Amy Coney Barrett was attacked for using words "sexual preference" and Merriam-Webster dictionary changed the definition of the word to be offensive in order to justify the attacks after the fact.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/merriam-webster-barrett-se...


Unfortunately, it does appear that way. [0]

[0]: https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/sdge-worker-fired-ove...


what, how... no... what... no... how... my brain hurts.


If they were not about to remove it of their own accord, but only after being provoked by a troll, they are indeed capitulating -- trying to pretend otherwise just ignores the problem instead of seeing it for what it is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: