Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
ferzul
on May 24, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Show HN: A dependently-typed programming language ...
isn't:
let x = 1:x
cyclic, but without closure? unless closure is so broad as to capture essentially any haskell value. it's not going to be obvious when there is a cyclic reference (e.g. if you use `let x = repeat 1` instead of the definition above)
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: